Why Can't SHM Explain a Ball Falling Through Earth's Radius?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the limitations of simple harmonic motion (SHM) in explaining the behavior of a ball falling through a hole in the Earth. It highlights that SHM is typically applicable for small displacements, where force is linearly proportional to displacement. However, in this scenario, the displacement is significant, potentially comparable to the Earth's radius, raising questions about the validity of the linear approximation. Participants emphasize that the standard model assumes uniform density and a small hole, which may not hold true for larger displacements. The conversation ultimately seeks to clarify the role of higher-order terms in the force equation when considering larger displacements.
Kolahal Bhattacharya
Messages
133
Reaction score
1
We all know that a ball when dropped into a straight hole through the earth, it begins shm.The question I want to raise here is we know that SHM happens when displacement is very small so that F(x) depends only on the linear term kx and not on the higher order terms:x62, x63 etc.Here the displacement is very big, may well be compared to The Earth's radius.where I am going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What higher order terms are you talking about? In the usual "ball dropped through a hole through the Earth" problem, we assume a uniform density and small hole, so that F(x) = kx throughout the motion.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top