Where Does the 4π in Coulomb's Constant Come From?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yaseen shah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origin of the 4π factor in Coulomb's law, specifically in the equation F = 1/(4πε₀) * (q₁q₂/r²). This factor arises from the definition of the permittivity of free space (ε₀) to simplify Maxwell's equations, avoiding additional 4π factors in calculations. The choice of using 1/(4πε₀) instead of a straightforward constant (k) is often more convenient, particularly in problems involving spherical symmetry. The 4π relates to the surface area of a unit sphere, linking it to Gauss's Law, which describes the relationship between electric flux and charge. Understanding this geometric context enhances the clarity of electric field calculations.
yaseen shah
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
i does not understand that in columbs constant where 4pi comes from
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you're referring to Coulomb's law:

F = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}

The factor of 4π is there just because of the way the constant \epsilon_0 (the "permittivity of free space") is defined. It's defined this way to avoid having extra factors of 4π in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations" , which are used much more often than Coulomb's law in practice.(This is all in SI units; in the Gaussian units system, still widely used, the factors of 4π in Maxwell's equations are retained, and Coulomb's law doesn't have the 4π in it.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The constant depends on the medium and we could write it as a straightforward constant(k) or ,what you are referring to,as 1/4pi*epsilon.The two constants are the same and in many problems it is easier to use the straightforward k but if we did there would be other problems where,because of spherical symmety,4 pi would appear in the final answer.Using the second form of the constant makes the 4pis cancel and for the majority of problems the second form is more convenient.

Hello yaseen
and hello cortiver .you just beat me to it
 
Good question. I have always assumed it corresponds to the unit sphere area of 4 pi steradians, but I could be wrong.
 
This is what you could say part of mathematical aesthetics, rather expressive of any more deep insights.
We have the mathematical freedom to define a "constant" as the product (or, for that matter, the sum) of two other constants, and we choose the one definition that gives the most "elegant" answers.
 
Good question. I have always assumed it corresponds to the unit sphere area of 4 pi steradians, but I could be wrong.
It does. In fact you have the area of a sphere there, 4pi r^2. The constant epsilon0 is chosen so that the factor 4pi r^2 can be understood geometrically. There is nothing wrong with getting rid of the 4pi though, but the geometrical meaning is slightly less obvious.

The geometrical meaning comes from Gauss's Law, which says that the flux of the electric field out of a closed surface surrounding a charge is proportional to the charge inside that surface. The proportionality constant is determined by how you measure charge (i.e what system of units you're using), 1/epsilon0 is most common, but you can chose it so that the 4pi cancels. In this context flux is basically the number of electric field lines crossing a surface. So it depends not just on the strength of the electric field, but also on the area of the surface. So for a sphere you have Flux = 4\pi r^2 E \propto Q.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top