Exploring the Quantum Oscillator Model for Diatomic Molecules

  • Thread starter Thread starter learning_phys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillator Quantum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of the quantum oscillator model for diatomic molecules, particularly at absolute zero (T=0). It highlights that, according to this model, molecules possess zero point energy, indicating they retain a minimum level of vibrational energy even at 0K. This raises the question of whether molecules vibrate at T=0, despite the absence of kinetic energy. The conversation suggests that molecules are never completely at rest, challenging the concept of achieving absolute zero. The link provided seeks further clarification on these concepts.
learning_phys
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
if the quantum oscillator was used to describe a diatomic molecule, then at T=0, the molecule shouldn't be vibrating at all. but using the quantum oscillator model, the molecule still has a minimum energy at its ground state related to its zero point energy. does this mean a molecule at T=0 DOES vibrate still?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion:
This implies that molecules are not completely at rest, even at 0K. Zero point energy = minimal energy of oscillation. On the other hand 0K means no kinetic energy, so we cannot achieve 0K.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top