Can a Bullet Hole Cause Explosive Decompression in a Submarine at 30m Depth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bassalisk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Explosive decompression would not occur in a submarine at 30 meters below sea level if a small opening, like a bullet hole, were made. Instead, the high external pressure would force water into the submarine at a high velocity. The pressure at this depth is approximately three times that of atmospheric pressure, meaning any breach would result in significant inward force rather than an explosion. While a bullet hole could cause damage, it would not lead to immediate catastrophic failure. The primary concern would be the potential for hull integrity loss, leading to collapse.
Bassalisk
Messages
946
Reaction score
2
Quick question, because i am new to this term. Would explosive decompression happen at 30m below sea, in a submarine, if we would make an small opening, like from a bullet?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This question is so vague its ridiculous. This is a materials' properties problem.
 
Thanks for the answer
 
No, explosive decompression would not occur in a sub under water. What would occur is the opposite effect. The great pressure on the sub would force water in at tremendous pressure/velocity.

Imagine holding your thumb over the opening in a garden hose. The water pressure behind your thumb has built up, causing you to have a hard time holding it closed. When you release just a small portion the water comes shooting out at high velocity, enabling you to water things from 10-20 ft away depending on your water pressure. Increase the pressure by opening the valve more and you can get a longer stream of water. Decrease it and the stream decreases.

Lets say we have an Aircraft at 40,000 ft. If for some reason his canopy suddenly shattered, then the pressure inside the cockpit would quickly equalize to the lower outside pressure. If this occurs fast enough, with a great enough pressure difference, then we call that explosive decompression.
 
Bassalisk said:
Quick question, because i am new to this term. Would explosive decompression happen at 30m below sea, in a submarine, if we would make an small opening, like from a bullet?

Thanks

As drakkith points out, the pressure is inward. Subs don't explode; they implode.

At 30m, the pressure is 3atm above air pressure.

If 1 square inch hole were made in the sub, it would come through with a force to support 14.7x3 = 44lbs. (A bullet hole is smaller, less than a quarter of that.)

That would do damage to anything in its way, but not immediately catastrophic.

The bigger issue would be that - in order to apply a force to penetrate the sub with a bullet-sized hole - you would possibly rupture its integrity, causing the hull to collapse.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top