MHB Exponential Equation solve 54⋅2^(2x)=72^x⋅√0.5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
AI Thread Summary
The exponential equation 54⋅2^(2x)=72^x⋅√0.5 is analyzed, with the goal of solving for x without using logarithms. The discussion highlights the need to equate the exponents of both sides, leading to the equations 2x + 1 = x - 1/2 and 3 = 2x. Initial attempts reveal inconsistencies in the solutions derived from these equations. However, a corrected approach simplifies the equation to show that 18^3 = 18^(2x), resulting in the solution x = 3/2. The final answer is confirmed as 3/2, resolving the problem.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I need assistance in solving this exponential equation.

\[54\cdot 2^{2x}=72^{x}\cdot \sqrt{0.5}\]

The final answer should be 3/2.

My strategy was to try and bring to a state where the exponents are equal. We know that 54 is 6 times 9. We also know 72 is 8 times 9. The solution probably involves the fact that 9 appears in both numbers.

Can you kindly assist ? Oh, one more thing, important thing. The use of logarithms is forbidden... :-)

Thank you .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Hello all,

I need assistance in solving this exponential equation.

\[54\cdot 2^{2x}=72^{x}\cdot \sqrt{0.5}\]

The final answer should be 3/2.

My strategy was to try and bring to a state where the exponents are equal. We know that 54 is 6 times 9.
More to the point, 54 is 2 times 27: 54= 2(3^3)

We also know 72 is 8 times 9.
Yes, and that is 72= (2^3)(3^2). Of course \sqrt{0.5}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}= 2^{-1/2}

The solution probably involves the fact that 9 appears in both numbers.

Can you kindly assist ? Oh, one more thing, important thing. The use of logarithms is forbidden... :-)

Thank you .
54(2^{2x})= 2(3^3)(2^{2x})= 2^{2x+1}(3^3) and 72^x\sqrt{0.5}= 2^x(3^{2x})2^{-1/2}= 2^{x- 1/2}3^{2x}

54(2^{2x})=72^x\sqrt{0.5} is the same as
2^{2x+1}(3^3)= 2^{x- 1/2}3^{2x}

But now we have a problem! In order for those to be equal the exponents of both 2 and 3 must be the same on each side. We must ave both 2x+ 1= x- 1/2 and 3= 2x. To solve 2x+ 1= x- 1/2, subtract x and 1 from both sides: x= -3/2. To solve 3= 2x divide both sides by 2: x= 3/2. Those are NOT the same! There is no value of x that satisfies this.
 
Thank you very much.

I think that you have a small mistake with the exponents at the beginning but the general approach helped me get to the correct solution.
 
$$54\cdot 2^{2x}=72^{x}\cdot \sqrt{0.5}$$

$$54\cdot 4^x=18^{x}\cdot4^x\cdot\sqrt{\frac12}$$

$$54=18^x\cdot\sqrt{\frac12}$$

$$2\cdot54^2=18^{2x}$$

$$2\cdot3^2\cdot18^2=18^{2x}$$

$$18^3=18^{2x}\implies x=\frac32$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top