Exponential Integral & Incomplete Gamma function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on comparing the exponential integral -E_{-2k}(-m) with the Gamma function \frac{1}{m^{2k+1}}\Gamma(2k+1} as k approaches infinity. The user, Pere, seeks to understand the behavior of their difference and concludes that it tends to zero, estimating the rate of convergence with the bound \frac{e^m}{2k+1}. Additionally, Pere inquires about the definition of the exponential integral for negative real numbers and resolves the question through analytic continuation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential integrals, specifically -E_{-2k}(-m)
  • Familiarity with the Gamma function, particularly \Gamma(2k+1)
  • Knowledge of limits and asymptotic behavior in mathematical analysis
  • Concept of analytic continuation in complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the exponential integral function for negative arguments
  • Study the asymptotic behavior of the difference between exponential integrals and Gamma functions
  • Explore analytic continuation techniques in complex analysis
  • Investigate bounds and estimates in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in mathematical analysis, and students studying special functions and their properties.

Pere Callahan
Messages
582
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I need to compare an exponential integral -E_{-2k}(-m) -where k is a positive integer and m just a real number- to a Gamma function \frac{1}{m^{2k+1}}\Gamma(2k+1).

I am using the notation from Mathworld here

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExponentialIntegral.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IncompleteGammaFunction.htmlI am interested in the behaviour of their difference as k\to\infty. It seems to tend to zero, but are there any estimates as to how fast the difference goes to zero?

Thansk for any comments. -Pere
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I ask should another question first.

How is the exponential integral function defined for real z less than zero...the integral representation clearly does not converge in that case... is it just analytic continuation or is there an explicit formula...?

Thanks

-Pere
 
Ok. Solved. I bound the difference by

\frac{e^m}{2k+1}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 200 ·
7
Replies
200
Views
31K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K