Express with at least one less pair of absolute value signs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression ||a+b|-|a|-|b|| by analyzing various cases based on the values of a and b. It concludes that the outermost absolute value signs can be removed by adding a negative sign, leading to the equivalent expression -(|a+b|-|a|-|b|). The triangle inequality is referenced, confirming that |a+b| is less than or equal to |a| + |b|, which supports the simplification. Additional cases, including when a or b equals zero, are examined, reinforcing that the simplification holds true across all scenarios. Overall, the analysis emphasizes the importance of case consideration in solving absolute value problems.
wifi
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
We have ## ||a+b|-|a|-|b|| ##. The only way I can think to eliminate one pair of absolute value signs is to consider the cases separately and determine which pair(s) can be removed without affecting the final answer. I'm trying to get better at doing these types of problems, so feel free to scrutinize this analysis.

Case 1: ## a>b>0 ##,

we have ## |a+b-a-b| = 0##.

Case 2a: ## a>0>b ## with ## b>-a \Rightarrow a+b>0##,

we have ## |a+b-a+b| = |2b| = |2| \cdot |b| = -2b ##.

Case 2b: ## a>0>b ## with ## b<-a \Rightarrow a+b<0##,

we have ## |-a-b-a+b| = |-2a| = |-2| \cdot |a| = 2a ##.

Case 3: ## 0>a>b ##,

we have ## |-a-b+a+b| = 0 ##.

After some inspection, one can see that the outermost pair of absolute value signs can be removed without affecting the final answer as long as a negative sign is added in its place. This is possible since the outermost absolute value bar serves only to change the sign in cases 2a and 2b.

So what we have is ## -(|a+b|-|a|-|b|) = |a|+|b|-|a+b| ##.

As a check, let's make sure this yields the same answers as the original expression.

Case 1: ## a>b>0 ##,

we have ## a+b-a-b = 0##.

Case 2a: ## a>0>b ## with ## b>-a \Rightarrow a+b>0##,

we have ## a-b-a-b= -2b ##.

Case 2b: ## a>0>b ## with ## b<-a \Rightarrow a+b<0##,

we have ## a-b+a+b = 2a ##.

Case 3: ## 0>a>b ##,

we have ## -a-b+a+b = 0 ##.

Same as above!

EDIT: Now that I'm thinking about it more, there are several cases I hadn't included:

If ## a=b ## we have ## ||a+a|-|a|-|a|| = ||2a|-|2a||= 0 ##.

If ## a=0, b>0 ## we have ## |b-b|=0 ##.

If ## a=0, b<0 ## we have ## |-b+b|=0 ##.

If ## a>0, b=0 ## we have ## |a-a|=0 ##.

If ## a<0, b=0 ## we have ## |-a+a|=0 ##.

Last but not least, for the trivial case ## a=0, b=0 ## we just have 0.

So we can see that in every case the outer bars may be removed without affecting the final answer. Thus, the answer is the same as described above. Sorry! Hopefully it's correct now.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
wifi said:
We have ## ||a+b|-|a|-|b|| ##. The only way I can think to eliminate one pair of absolute value signs is to consider the cases separately and determine which pair(s) can be removed without affecting the final answer. I'm trying to get better at doing these types of problems, so feel free to scrutinize this analysis.
Can't that be written as ##||a+b|-(|a|+|b|)|##? Are you familiar with the triangle inequality?

The triangle inequality applies to the real number line as a vector space by using the absolute value function as the norm. The triangle inequality states that ##|a+b|\leq|a|+|b|##. What does that imply here?
 
Mandelbroth said:
Can't that be written as ##||a+b|-(|a|+|b|)|##? Are you familiar with the triangle inequality?

The triangle inequality applies to the real number line as a vector space by using the absolute value function as the norm. The triangle inequality states that ##|a+b|\leq|a|+|b|##. What does that imply here?

Yes, I am familiar with that inequality.

This implies that ##|a+b|-(|a|+|b|)\leq 0##. Thus, we can include the negative sign and remove the outermost absolute values bars as I did. Now I feel like what I did was a bit excessive. :redface:

I feel as though I discover only the least clever method for solving problems.
 
Last edited:
wifi said:
Yes, I am familiar with that inequality.

This implies that ##|a+b|-(|a|+|b|)\leq 0##. Thus, we can include the negative sign and remove the outermost absolute values bars as I did. Now I feel like what I did was a bit excessive. :redface:
Proof by exhaustion is perfectly acceptable. Though, my suggestion for you would be to wait before you decide to separate it into every single case and solve. That will only work when there is a finite number of cases. I like this depiction:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mandelbroth said:
Proof by exhaustion is perfectly acceptable. Though, my suggestion for you would be to wait before you decide to separate it into every single case and solve. That will only work when there is a finite number of cases. I like this depiction:

Ha! I definitely learned my lesson.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top