Expressing a variable from cross product

v-v
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can I use cyclic rotation in \vec{a} = \vec{b} x \vec{c} and say:
\vec{c} = \vec{a} x \vec{b}
\vec{b} = \vec{c} x \vec{a}

for any vectors \vec{a}, \vec{b} and \vec{c} or only if they are perpendicular to each other?

If it's only a special case: is there a way to express \vec{b} and \vec{c} from the previous equation?

(I'm asking because of the equation in electromagnetism that says \vec{E}=c(\vec{B}x\vec{U}) where I might need to find any of the 3 vectors from the other two)

I hope writing down the matrices, finding the inverses and solving a matrix equation is not the only way.

Thank you :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Remember that the cross product of any two vectors is perpendicular to the two vectors. If \vec{a}= \vec{b}\times\vec{c} with \vec{b} and \vec{c} not perpendicular, then we cannot have \vec{b}= \vec{c}\times\vec{a}[/itex] because that says \vec{b} is perpendicular to \vec{c} nor can \vec{c}= \vec{a}\times\vec{b} because then \vec{c} would be perpendicular to \vec{b}.
 
Thank you :)
 
You can explore the various possibilities with this handy identity:

\left ( \textbf{a} \times \textbf{b} \right ) \times \textbf{c} = \left ( \textbf{a} \cdot \textbf{c} \right ) \textbf{b} - \left ( \textbf{b} \cdot \textbf{c} \right ) \textbf{a}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top