Expressing p in Terms of q, r, and s from Quadratic Equation (1)

[phospho]

6pq+r=\sqrt{r^2-4ps}, \ \ p\neq 0 \ \ (1)

Without squaring (1) or any of it's rearrangements, express p in terms of only q, r and s.I realized this is some sort of quadratic formula so I got p = \dfrac{-r+\sqrt{r^2-4ps}}{6q}

so for the quadratic ap^2 + bp + c,
a = 3q, b = r, c = s,
3qp^2 + rp + s

i'm stuck from here.

 

[SammyS]

6pq+r=\sqrt{r^2-4ps}, \ \ p\neq 0 \ \ (1)

Without squaring (1) or any of it's rearrangements, express p in terms of only q, r and s.

I realized this is some sort of quadratic formula so I got p = \dfrac{-r+\sqrt{r^2-4ps}}{6q}

so for the quadratic ap^2 + bp + c,
a = 3q, b = r, c = s,
3qp^2 + rp + s

I'm stuck from here.

Does the quadratic formula count as squaring equation (1) ? Just asking ...

If it's OK to use the quadratic formula, then notice that in relation to the standard quadratic equation,

ax^2+bx+c=0​

the quantities under the radical are the coefficients, a, b, and c.

\displaystyle x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}​

Puttying this in a form similar to eq. (1) gives

\displaystyle 2ax+b=\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}​

 

[gabbagabbahey]

6pq+r=\sqrt{r^2-4ps}, \ \ p\neq 0 \ \ (1)

Without squaring (1) or any of it's rearrangements, express p in terms of only q, r and s.


I realized this is some sort of quadratic formula so I got p = \dfrac{-r+\sqrt{r^2-4ps}}{6q}

so for the quadratic ap^2 + bp + c,
a = 3q, b = r, c = s,
3qp^2 + rp + s

i'm stuck from here.

errm... 4ac \neq 4ps so this isn't quite so nice

 

[phospho]

Does the quadratic formula count as squaring equation (1) ? Just asking ...

If it's OK to use the quadratic formula, then notice that in relation to the standard quadratic equation,

ax^2+bx+c=0​

the quantities under the radical are the coefficients, a, b, and c.

\displaystyle x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}​

Puttying this in a form similar to eq. (1) gives

\displaystyle 2ax+b=\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}​

It doesn't no.

I somehow managin to get p = \dfrac{-(rq+s)}{3q^2} which is incorrect

errm... 4ac \neq 4ps so this isn't quite so nice

could you explain?

 

[phospho]

never mind I rearranged into 3q = \dfrac{-r+\sqrt{r^2-4ps}}{2p} and got the right answer.

thanks!

 

[eumyang]

never mind I rearranged into 3q = \dfrac{-r\sqrt{r^2-4ps}}{2p} and got the right answer.

Not sure how you got the right answer, because what you wrote doesn't follow from the original. Also, I thought the question was to...

express p in terms of only q, r and s.

Color me confused.

 

[SammyS]

never mind I rearranged into 3q = \dfrac{-r\sqrt{r^2-4ps}}{2p} and got the right answer.

thanks!

So, what did you get for p ?

 

[phospho]

So, what did you get for p ?

Not sure how you got the right answer, because what you wrote doesn't follow from the original. Also, I thought the question was to...

Color me confused.

well the original equation is 6pq + r = \sqrt{r^2-4ps} I rearranged to get 3q = \dfrac{-r+\sqrt{r^2-4ps}}{2p} I then compared it with x = \dfrac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} giving x = 3q, b = r, c = s so: p(3q)^2 +r3q +s = 0 rearranging to get p = \dfrac{-(3qr + s)}{9q^2} which is correct (or so it says.)

 

[SammyS]

well the original equation is 6pq + r = \sqrt{r^2-4ps} I rearranged to get 3q = \dfrac{-r+\sqrt{r^2-4ps}}{2p} I then compared it with x = \dfrac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} giving x = 3q, b = r, c = s so: p(3q)^2 +r3q +s = 0 rearranging to get p = \dfrac{-(3qr + s)}{9q^2} which is correct (or so it says.)

I agree.