Extrema of electrical potential

AI Thread Summary
A charge of 2 C at the origin and two -1 C charges at (1, 1, 0) and (-1, 1, 0) create an electric potential φ that is zero at (0, 1, 0) and must have a minimum or maximum further along the y-axis. The potential function is derived as φ = 2k/y - 2k/sqrt(2-y), leading to the derivative dφ/dy = 2k(1/y^2 - 1/(2(2-y)^(3/2))). There is uncertainty in solving the resulting equation y^2 = -2(2-y)^(3/2) and the differentiation process, with suggestions to set the derivative to zero for finding y. Numerical methods or graphing are recommended for approximating the solution. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of deriving and solving equations related to electric potential.
FS98
Messages
105
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



A charge of 2 C is located at the origin. Two charges of −1 C each are located at the points (1, 1, 0) and (−1, 1, 0). If the potential φ is taken to be zero at infinity (as usual), then it is easy to see that φ is also zero at the point (0, 1, 0). It follows that somewhere on the y-axis beyond (0, 1, 0) the function φ (0, y, 0) must have a minimum or a maximum. At that point the electric field E must be zero. Why? Locate the point, at least approximately.

Homework Equations



φ = kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



φ = 2k/y - 2k/sqrt(2-y)

The sqrt(2-y) comes from finding the distance between a given point on the y-axis and a particle through the Pythagorean theorom. The -2 coming from the fact that there are two negative charges with a magnitude of 1.

Then I took the derivative

dφ/dy = 2k(1/y^2-(1/2(2-y)^(3/2))

Set that equal to 0 and do some rearranging and crossing out.

y^2 = -2(2-y)^(3/2)

If I’ve done everything right up to this point, I don’t know how to solve for y in the final step.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FS98 said:
The sqrt(2-y) comes from finding the distance between a given point on the y-axis and a particle through the Pythagorean theorom.
Note that sqrt(2-y) = 0 when y = 2. Does that seem right?
 
  • Like
Likes FS98
TSny said:
Note that sqrt(2-y) = 0 when y = 2. Does that seem right?
I did the trig over and got sqrt(y^2-2y+2) for the distance between a given value of y and the -1C particles.

After doing the rearranging again I have

y^2 = -2(y^2-2y+2)

Which I’m still unsure how to solve.
 
FS98 said:
I did the trig over and got sqrt(y^2-2y+2) for the distance between a given value of y and the -1C particles.
OK. That looks right.

After doing the rearranging again I have

y^2 = -2(y^2-2y+2)

Which I’m still unsure how to solve.
I don't understand how you got this equation.
 
TSny said:
OK. That looks right.

I don't understand how you got this equation.
I think I differentiated incorrectly. I have

2k(1/y-(1/sqrt(y^2-2y+2)) for the potential energy.

I think the derivative is then
2k((2*y-2)/(2*(y^2-2*y+2)^(3/2))-1/y^2)

I’m not sure where to go from there.
 
FS98 said:
I think I differentiated incorrectly. I have

2k(1/y-(1/sqrt(y^2-2y+2)) for the potential energy.

I think the derivative is then
2k((2*y-2)/(2*(y^2-2*y+2)^(3/2))-1/y^2)
OK. I think that's right.

I’m not sure where to go from there.
As you noted in your first post, you should set this equal to zero and solve for y. I believe you will only be able to get an approximate solution by using some numerical technique or by using a graph.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top