Extremely confusing dynamics question

  • Thread starter Thread starter SecretSnow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Dynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a painter in a crate and the forces acting on them. The painter weighs 1000N, and when he pulls on the rope, he exerts a force of 450N on the crate's floor. There is confusion regarding whether the system is accelerating upwards or downwards and the relationship between the tension in the rope and the normal force. Participants emphasize the importance of not neglecting the painter's weight and suggest using free body diagrams to clarify the forces at play. The conversation highlights the need for a clear understanding of the dynamics involved to solve the problem accurately.
SecretSnow
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, this is so confusing as there are lots of assumption needed (I think). I can't do this even though I got the answer and tried working backwards.

A painter in a crate which hangs alongside a building, weighs 1000N.When the painter pulls on the rope, the force he exerts on the floor of the crate is 450N. If the crate wieghs 250N, find the acceleration. Answer: 2.0ms^-2

Firstly, we don't know whether the system is even accelerating upwards or downwards..and I also realized that the tension exerted may be just the normal force of 450N exerted back onto the painter (since he exerts 450N on the floor) does that mean he is apparently weightless? That is quite strange though, because if we consider in terms of forces acting on the painter, then it's 450N from the floor and 450N from the rope, both acting upwards. And I'm asking this because some answers I found online say the weight of the painter can be neglected although I don't know why...pls help! I'm stuck in this one question for a long long long time...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phrased like that, the problem statement should have some sketch attached.

The answer is right if a rope goes from the crate over some fixed anchor (at the top of the building) back to the painter.
 
SecretSnow said:
A painter in a crate which hangs alongside a building, weighs 1000N.
Note this means the painter weighs 1000N, not painter plus crate.
we don't know whether the system is even accelerating upwards or downwards..
You shouldn't need to predict that - it will come out in the answer.
and I also realized that the tension exerted may be just the normal force of 450N exerted back onto the painter
The tension in the rope equals the normal force from the floor? Why should it?
some answers I found online say the weight of the painter can be neglected
The weight of the painter is given, and certainly cannot be neglected.
Have you drawn free body diagrams for crate and painter, including an unknown tension? What equations do you get?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top