F = MA Exam 2012 # 23 (Measuring local gravitational acceleration)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying which equipment cannot measure local gravitational acceleration (g). Options A, B, D, and E are deemed valid methods for measuring g, while option C is highlighted as problematic because it suggests using multiple carts of different masses, which do not affect the time taken to descend an incline. The reasoning is that the time depends solely on the incline's length and angle, not the mass of the carts. There is uncertainty regarding the specifications of equipment in option E, particularly whether the string's length is known, which affects its feasibility. Ultimately, the consensus is that option C is the least effective for measuring g due to its reliance on multiple masses.
SignaturePF
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of the following sets of equipment cannot be used to measure the local value of the acceleration due to
gravity (g)?
(A) A spring scale (which reads in force units) and a known mass.
(B) A rod of known length, an unknown mass, and a stopwatch.
(C) An inclined plane of known inclination, several carts of different known masses, and a stopwatch.←
CORRECT
(D) A launcher which launches projectiles at a known speed, a projectile of known mass, and a meter stick.
(E) A motor with a known output power, a known mass, a piece of string of unknown length, and a stopwatch

The Attempt at a Solution


I eliminated A because that is a fundamental way to measure gravity, as a scale reads normal force. Simply place an object on flat ground where Normal force = mg, divide the known normal force by the known mass, and we have gravity.
I eliminated B since we can use uniform accelerated motion.
Δy = v_0t + 1/2at^2
since v_0 = 0
Δy = 1/2at^2, we also know t, so clearly we can find a
C I believed you could find, I'm not sure why you can't.
D I thought you could use projectile motion equations.
E I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With C, having carts of several different masses is not that useful, because every mass will take the same time to get from the top of the incline to the bottom. The time depends only on the length of the incline, the inclination angle, and the acceleration due to gravity. So you really only need one cart, but you must also know the length of the incline. Perhaps you are meant to assume that you do NOT know this (because you have no metre stick)?
 
For E, maybe you are supposed to try and wind the string (with mass hanging from it) onto the motor shaft at a constant speed, and since P = Fv, if you know v, you can find F, which is equal to mg (since the speed is constant, the lifting force must be balancing the weight). The thing I don't get is how you're supposed to get v with just a stopwatch and no known lengths. EDIT: Are you sure it wasn't a piece of string of *known* length?
 
Last edited:
For E, you can use the motor and the stopwatch to deliver a known KE. Knowing the mass that tells you the speed. Use that to launch the mass vertically and time it to top of trajectory.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top