F(y)=summation 1/(y^2+m^2) is not differentiable.

  • Thread starter Thread starter R.P.F.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiable
R.P.F.
Messages
210
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is f(y)=\sum_{m=1}^\infty \frac{1}{y^2+m^2}<br />differentiable?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



From the graph, it is obvious that f is not differentiable at y=0, but I don't know how to prove that. I proved that \sum_{m=1}^n f_m=\sum_{m=1}^n\frac{1}{y^2+m^2} converges uniformly to f. Does this help? Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The uniform convergence of differentiable functions does not prove the sum is differentiable. If the derivatives converge uniformly then it is. Don't you have a theorem like that? And why is it clear it's not differentiable at zero?
 
Dick said:
The uniform convergence of differentiable functions does not prove the sum is differentiable. If the derivatives converge uniformly then it is. Don't you have a theorem like that? And why is it clear it's not differentiable at zero?

I have been thinking that each f_m is strictly increasing on (0,\infty). Therefore, so is f(y). If f is differentiable, then f'(0)=0 which is not true. Is this correct?
 
R.P.F. said:
I have been thinking that each f_m is strictly increasing on (0,\infty). Therefore, so is f(y). If f is differentiable, then f'(0)=0 which is not true. Is this correct?

Do you mean decreasing? f'(0) has to be zero, the function is even. 1/(x^2+1) is strictly decreasing on [0,infinity). It's perfectly differentiable.
 
Dick said:
Do you mean decreasing? f'(0) has to be zero, the function is even. 1/(x^2+1) is strictly decreasing on [0,infinity). It's perfectly differentiable.

Yeah I meant decreasing.
I know that each f_m is differentiable on R. But f is not. I don't know how to prove this though. I am trying to prove by contradiction, but I cannot find a contradiction.
 
Dick said:
Do you mean decreasing? f'(0) has to be zero, the function is even. 1/(x^2+1) is strictly decreasing on [0,infinity). It's perfectly differentiable.

I think that f is not differentiable at y=0 because the graph of f is really pointy at y=0...
 
R.P.F. said:
I think that f is not differentiable at y=0 because the graph of f is really pointy at y=0...

If f(y) looks really pointy at y=0 it might be a problem with the graphing program. This is an analysis course, right? You shouldn't rely on that.
 
Dick said:
If f(y) looks really pointy at y=0 it might be a problem with the graphing program. This is an analysis course, right? You shouldn't rely on that.

Hi,

Now I see how to show that it is differentiable at x=0, but still don't know how to show that it is differentiable on the rest of R. I have two tools: cauchy criterion and weierstrass m-test. I tried both but none worked. Can you give some hints? Thanks.
 
R.P.F. said:
Hi,

Now I see how to show that it is differentiable at x=0, but still don't know how to show that it is differentiable on the rest of R. I have two tools: cauchy criterion and weierstrass m-test. I tried both but none worked. Can you give some hints? Thanks.

Like I said before, you want to prove the sum of the derivatives converges uniformly to f'(x). The weierstrass m-test should work fine. Can you show use where you are having trouble with it?
 
  • #10
Dick said:
Like I said before, you want to prove the sum of the derivatives converges uniformly to f'(x). The weierstrass m-test should work fine. Can you show use where you are having trouble with it?

Hey i actually figured it out! I did not think about using fundamental calc to find a bound at first...Thanks! :)
 
Back
Top