F1 control arms - Designed with downforce in mind or?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chriswh86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control Mind
AI Thread Summary
F1 control arms are primarily designed to maintain a symmetrical profile, as mandated by regulations, to prevent them from being used as aerodynamic devices. This design choice aims to ensure safety at high speeds, as any aerodynamic shape could pose risks during suspension movement. While the rules restrict the use of control arms for downforce generation, some argue that innovative engineering could still allow for aerodynamic benefits within these constraints. The discussion highlights the balance between safety and performance in F1 design. Understanding the regulations is crucial for engineers looking to optimize both aspects.
chriswh86
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
Are F1 control arms, upper/lower designed to supply an amount of downforce or just the ability to cut through the air with as little interferance as possible?

I had seen a photo recent and it got me woundering. Maybe someone can explain

Cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
F1 rules

Suspension and steering systems
The suspension members must have a symmetrical profile for the majority of their length. This is to prevent designers using them as aerodynamic devices.
 
I imagine it would be pretty dangerous if you had a aerodynamic shape of any kind going up and down[though slight,suspension has limited movement] at 200 mph.I maybe wrong,but it just doesn't seem safe.
 
Ranger Mike said:
F1 rules

Suspension and steering systems



The suspension members must have a symmetrical profile for the majority of their length. This is to prevent designers using them as aerodynamic devices.

That's indeed what the regulations say. There are symmetric airfoils though ;)
With this in mind I believe that a smart engineer can come up with a smart solution ;)
(http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2013/0/1042.html )
Or is it totally forbidden for the suspension?
Hmm, I think I should study the regulations in depth...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Back
Top