Factor in equation (3.49) of Peskin and Schroeder

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmlaniel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin Schroeder
jmlaniel
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
My question concerns the 1/2 factor in the exponential of Eq. (3.49) of Peskin and Schroeder.

This equation concerns the Lorentz boost transformation of a spinor along the z-axis (or 3-direction).

According to Eq. (3.26):

S^{03} = -\frac{i}{2}\begin{bmatrix}\sigma^3 & 0 \\0 & -\sigma^3\end{bmatrix}

and Eq. (3.30):

\Lambda_{1/2} = exp(-\frac{i}{2}\omega_{03} S^{03})

Combining these two expressions and using the infinitesimal boost (according to Eq. (3.48) and Eq. (3.21)): \omega_{03} = \eta (here \eta is the rapidity):

\Lambda_{1/2} = exp(-\frac{1}{4}\eta \begin{bmatrix}\sigma^3 & 0 \\0 & -\sigma^3\end{bmatrix})

My problem is that Peskin and Schroeder have a 1/2 factor where my simple substitution gives a 1/4?

Am I misinterpresting the meaning of \omega_{03}? I am assuming that \eta = \beta (v/c) from my understanding of Eq. (3.21)... this might be a problem?!?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jmlaniel said:
[...] and Eq. (3.30):

\Lambda_{1/2} = exp(-\frac{i}{2}\omega_{03} S^{03})
In my version of P&S, eq(3.30) is
$$
\Lambda_{1/2} = exp(-\frac{i}{2}\omega_{\mu\nu} S^{\mu\nu})
$$
and you must sum over ##\mu, \nu##. So you need an exponent involving
$$
(\omega_{03} S^{03} + \omega_{30} S^{30})
$$
Is that enough for you to figure out the rest...?
 
Thanks Strangerep! I just completely forgot the summation over the indices... That was also enough for me to figure out the rest!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top