Can this polynomial with integer coefficients be factored?

AI Thread Summary
The polynomial x^{5024}+x^{1004}+1 cannot be factored with integer coefficients due to the absence of rational roots, as neither 1 nor -1 satisfies the equation. While it has no real roots, it can be expressed as a product of quadratic factors with real coefficients, resulting in 2512 such factors. The discussion raises the question of whether polynomials of the form x^n+x^m+1, where n and m are even integers, can be factored over the integers. A counterexample is suggested, indicating that such factorizations may be possible under certain conditions, particularly when n is an integral multiple of m. Overall, the factorization of polynomials with integer coefficients is complex and depends on specific relationships between their degrees.
sutupidmath
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
4
the question is this: factor the following polynomial with integer coefficients:

x^{5024}+x^{1004}+1

my first thought is that since this polynomial doesn't have real roots such a factorization isn't even possible, but i really don't have any more clever idea how to factor this one.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The only possible rational roots of that are 1 and -1. Obviously neither of those satisfies the equation x^{5024}+ x^{1004}+ 1= 0 so it has no rational roots and so cannot be factored with integer coefficients.
 
Ok now, say we take out the requirement that the coefficients be integers. Then, if we are simply looking to express that polynomial as a product of two other polinomials, then will it include inevitably complex coefficients? Or, how would that factorization in terms of two other polynomials look like? Since, we won't have real roots, i see that there will only be complex roots, so even the factorization, from my point of view, seems to include inevitably complex coefficients, right?
 
Not necessarily. Since it has real coefficients, all complex roots must come in "complex conjugate" pairs: a+ bi and a- bi. Any factorization into linear factors would have to be of the form (x-(a+bi))(x-(a-bi)) but those multiplied together: ((x-a)- bi)((x-a)+ bi)= (x-a)2+ b2= x2- 2ax+ a2+ b2 so it can be factored into 5024/2= 2512 quadratic factors with real coefficients.
 
so, does it mean that in general any polynomial, say of the form

x^n+x^m+1 where both n,m are even integers cannot be factored over the integers. That is cannot be written, say as a product of two polynomials with integer coefficients?
 
I say this is possible to be written, right? SInce, i can already find a counterexample if you say otherwise? So, when would it be the case? i assume wehnever n, is an integral multiple of m, right?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top