Falling skydiver differential equation

darryw
Messages
124
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The velocity v(t) of a skydiver falling to the ground is governed by

m dv/dt = mg - kv^2

where m is the skydiver's mass, g is the acceleration due to gravity, k > 0 is the drag
coefficient, and v(t) >= 0.

Solve this equation for v(t) with the initial condition v(0) = 0.


Homework Equations



I have been doing other diff equations but when its a word problem it confuses me.. So, i treat m, g and k as constants.
I rearranged equation into this:

dv/dt + (k/m)v^2 = g

so now i can use integrating factor..

mu(x) = e^integ (k/m) ...but I am going to stop here already, in case I am already on wrong track.. The fact that v is squared changes things, no? (cant use integrating factor?) If this is ok though, i will proceed.. Thanks a lot for any help/tips

The Attempt at a Solution




 
Physics news on Phys.org
darryw said:

Homework Equations



I have been doing other diff equations but when its a word problem it confuses me.. So, i treat m, g and k as constants.
I rearranged equation into this:

dv/dt + (k/m)v^2 = g

so now i can use integrating factor..

mu(x) = e^integ (k/m) ...but I am going to stop here already, in case I am already on wrong track.. The fact that v is squared changes things, no? (cant use integrating factor?) If this is ok though, i will proceed.. Thanks a lot for any help/tips

Instead of putting it in that form, put it in a different form

\frac{dv}{dt} = g- \frac{k}{m}v^2

\frac{1}{g- \frac{k}{m}v^2} \frac{dv}{dt} = 1

Split into partial fractions.
 
I don't understand the reason for putting it in that form?
 
darryw said:
I don't understand the reason for putting it in that form?

You had it in the form of

dv/dt + (k/m)v2 = g


this will not give you an integrating factor of e∫(k/m)dt


had the v2, just been 'v', then it would work fine.
 
ok thankjs, .so in the form you have it i can get an integ factor? I mean, this is the method i need to use to solve right? (integrating factor) (as opposed to separable equation)
 
darryw said:
ok thankjs, .so in the form you have it i can get an integ factor? I mean, this is the method i need to use to solve right? (integrating factor) (as opposed to separable equation)
Forget integrating factors for this problem. The integrating factor business applies to problems in this form:
y' + P(x)y = Q(x)
What you have doesn't fit in this form.

rock.freak667 has shown you how to separate the equation and has given you advice on how to continue.
 
I need to confirm something before I proceed solving: in this equation, t in independent variable, v is dependent variable. k,m, and g are all constants. Is that correct?

Also, if i compare this to the previous equations I've been solving, t is like x (independent), and v is like y (dependent). and also t will always be independent because its time in these motion differential equations right? thanks
 
Yes.
 
Back
Top