Faraday's vs Ampere's Laws and current density

AI Thread Summary
Faraday's Law states that a time-varying magnetic field induces an electromotive force (EMF), which can produce an electric current density in a medium. The relationship between current density (J) and electric field (E) is confirmed by the equation J=sigma*E, where sigma represents conductivity. The discussion includes a practical experiment involving a coil and solenoid setup, where varying frequencies and turns resulted in different induced EMF measurements. The observed induced EMF was significantly higher than initial calculations, prompting a request for recommendations on the experimental setup. The conversation highlights the practical implications of electromagnetic principles in real-world applications.
VictorVictor5
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Greetings all,

I know that Faraday's and Ampere's law are related by M.E., but can I say the following?

By Faraday’s Law, a time varying magnetic field induces an electromotive force, which produces an electric current density in a media.

Up until EMF, that's Faraday's, but is the rest of the sentence true? I would assume yes since J=sigma*E, or E=J/sigma to keep it in line with using Del X E = -jwB, or Del X J/sigma=-jwB.

Just trying to confirm.

Thanks!
VV5
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The EMF can produce a current if there is a circuit. The current will depend on EMF and resistance. The current density will depend on E and resistivity.
 
On the right side of Del X E you would have the negative of the time derivative of B. The substitution for E looks fine.
 
Thanks to both!
 
hi
i have a coil of three turns and the spacing between the turns is 5 mm. i feed the coil with a signal of 13.24 MHz. and i put a solenoid of 3 mm radius 21 cm away from the coil to induce an emf. the solenoid has 23 number of tuns, 28 mm length. the induced emf is 280 mm V (rms) which is almost 10 times more than what i calculated. when i diconnect the coil from the signal generator, the induced voltage is 128 mmV(rms). the net emf= 152 mmVrms..
when the feeding freequency increased to 13.56 MHz and the solenoids number of turns decreased to 22. induced emf =460 mmV (rms) discennected 213 mmV. net induced emf=247 mV (rms).
can any recomand me any think.
thank you
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top