FCC Reciprocal to BCC: Proving Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Piano man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fcc Reciprocal
Piano man
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The proof seems fairly straight forward, but after plugging in the primitive vectors to the equations for the reciprocal lattice vectors, I'm getting
2\pi\frac{\frac{a^2}{4}(x+y-z)}{\frac{a}{2}(y+z)\cdot(\frac{a^2}{4}(-x+y+z))}

One proof I checked said that the bottom line's
(y+z)\cdot(-x+y+z)=2

I don't see how. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Piano man! :smile:

If this is a dot product then x.y = y.z = z.x = 0. :wink:
 
:blushing: :facepalm:

thanks I completely forgot that.
So it would reduce to y.y + z.z = 2

A tad embarrassing not to spot that :D
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top