FEM Clarification: What is a Linear Element?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fem
AI Thread Summary
A finite element is considered linear when its shape functions are linear in the 1D variable, typically referred to as "p=1" elements. This definition focuses on the interpolation functions used to map the geometric element rather than the material's linearity. Linear elements are generally associated with geometrically simple shapes, such as rods or beams, and are applicable in scenarios involving linear elastic materials without plasticity or large deformations. The discussion emphasizes that the term "linear" primarily pertains to the mathematical formulation of the element rather than the physical properties of the materials involved. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate finite element modeling.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

In my book on FEM they talk about "linear elements" (in 1D). My question is: When is a finite element considered linear?

Is it when the shape (interpolation) functions are linear in the 1D variable?
Is it when the trial function is linear in the 1D variable?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Niles said:
Hi

In my book on FEM they talk about "linear elements" (in 1D). My question is: When is a finite element considered linear?

Is it when the shape (interpolation) functions are linear in the 1D variable?
Is it when the trial function is linear in the 1D variable?

interesting question, but I cannot help you. Just a guess...when the material is fully elastic?
 
It could mean several different things

1. The element is geometrically a straight or curved line (for example a rod or beam) not a surface or solid element.
2. The element shape functions are linear.
3. The element formulation only works for linear elastic materials (no plasticity, creep, etc).
4. The element formulation only works for small strain, small displacement problems.

Without more context, it's hard to give a good answer.
 
"Linear element" normally just mean that the shape functions used to map the geometric element (the element as it looks in the body you are meshing) to the parent element are linear (1D), bilinear (2d), or trilinear (3d). This is sometimes called "p=1" (for polynomial level = 1) elements. Normally they aren't talking at all about the linearity of the material constitutive relation. In 1D, two shape functions completely define the behavior of the computed variable (in structures, that would be the displacement field); in 2D, four shape functions, and 3D, 8 shape functions--you'll often read that an element is defined by the number of nodes, though that's confusing sometimes, as in p=2 (quads) and higher p-levels, you have shape functions assigned to element edges and the middle of the element.
 
Thanks for all the suggestions!

Cheers!

Niles.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top