Fermat's Little Theorem .... Anderson and Feil, Theorem 8.7 .... ....

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Theorem 8.7 from Anderson and Feil's "A First Course in Abstract Algebra," specifically focusing on Fermat's Little Theorem. Participants seek clarification on two aspects: the absence of zero divisors in fields and the uniqueness of elements in a set \( S \) due to multiplicative cancellation. The proof confirms that in a field, every element is non-zero, and multiplicative cancellation ensures that no two elements in \( S \) can be identical. Peter acknowledges the clarity of the first question after reflection and appreciates Evgeny's assistance in understanding the second question.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral domains and fields
  • Familiarity with Fermat's Little Theorem
  • Knowledge of zero divisors in algebra
  • Concept of multiplicative cancellation in fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of zero divisors in different algebraic structures
  • Explore the proof of Fermat's Little Theorem in various contexts
  • Investigate the properties of fields and integral domains
  • Learn about the concept of equivalence classes in algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, educators teaching algebraic structures, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Fermat's Little Theorem and its applications in fields and integral domains.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Anderson and Feil - A First Course in Abstract Algebra.

I am currently focused on Ch. 8: Integral Domains and Fields ...

I need some help with an aspect of the proof of Theorem 8.7 (Fermat's Little Theorem) ...

Theorem 8.7 and its proof read as follows:
View attachment 6435
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6436

My questions regarding the above are as follows:
Question 1

In the above text from Anderson and Feil we read the following:

" ... ... Because a field has no zero divisors, each element of $$S$$ is non-zero ... "Can someone please demonstrate exactly why this follows ... ?

Question 2

In the above text from Anderson and Feil we read the following:" ... ... Because a field satisfies multiplicative cancellation, no two of these elements are the same .. ... "Can someone please demonstrate exactly why it follows that no two of the elements of $$S$$ are the same .. ... "
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter*** EDIT ***
oh dear ... can see that the answer to Question 1 is obvious ... indeed it follows from the definition of zero divisor ... apologies ... brain not in gear ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
" ... ... Because a field satisfies multiplicative cancellation, no two of these elements are the same .. ... "Can someone please demonstrate exactly why it follows that no two of the elements of $$S$$ are the same .. ... "
If $[x\cdot i]=[x\cdot j]$, then $x$ can be canceled and we have $i=j$.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
If $[x\cdot i]=[x\cdot j]$, then $x$ can be canceled and we have $i=j$.
Thanks Evgeny ... grateful for your help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K