Fermat's Theorem: A Math Problem and the Smart Boy Who Proved It Wrong

AI Thread Summary
A computer scientist claimed to have proven Fermat's Last Theorem for three specific numbers but was challenged by a 10-year-old boy who identified a mistake. The boy pointed out that the theorem cannot hold for those numbers, prompting the scientist to check his calculations and discover a bug in his computer program. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding modular arithmetic, as the boy noted the numbers' patterns in relation to modulo 5. The conversation revolves around the implications of these findings and the mathematical principles involved. Ultimately, the incident underscores the significance of critical thinking in mathematics.
uranium_235
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
from: http://www.math.utah.edu/~cherk/puzzles.html
Fermat, computers, and a smart boy
A computer scientist claims that he proved somehow that the Fermat theorem is correct for the following 3 numbers:

x=2233445566,
y=7788990011,
z=9988776655

He announces these 3 numbers and calls for a press conference where he is going to present the value of N (to show that

x^N + y^N = z^N

and that the guy from Princeton was wrong). As the press conference starts, a 10-years old boy raises his hand and says that the respectable scientist has made a mistake and the Fermat theorem cannot hold for those 3 numbers. The scientist checks his computer calculations and finds a bug.

How did the boy figure out that the scientist was wrong?

I am stumped, I noticed the pattern in the digits of the numbers, but I do not see how I can link that to the possibility of forming such a statement with those numbers when n is greater than 2.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x==1Mod 5, Y==1 Mod 5, Z==0 Mod 5.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top