Fermi-Dirac distribution at T->0 and \mu->\epsilon_0

Click For Summary
The limit of the Fermi-Dirac distribution as temperature approaches zero and chemical potential approaches Fermi energy is calculated to be 1/2. There is confusion regarding the transition from energy levels ε_k to the Fermi energy ε_F, which is essential for understanding the behavior of particles at absolute zero. As temperature approaches zero, the occupation probability f behaves differently based on the relationship between ε_k and ε_F. Specifically, for ε_k greater than ε_F, f approaches 0, while for ε_k less than ε_F, f approaches 1. At ε_k equal to ε_F, the occupation probability is consistently 1/2 for any non-zero temperature.
mcas
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Starting with F-C distrubution for ##T>0##
$$f(\epsilon_\vec{k})=(e^{\frac{(\epsilon_\vec{k} - \mu)}{kT}}+1)^{-1}$$
derive a distrubution at limit of ##T->0## when ##\mu(T)-> \epsilon_F##
Relevant Equations
##f(\epsilon_\vec{k})=(e^{\frac{(\epsilon_\vec{k} - \mu)}{kT}}+1)^(-1)##
##\mu(T=0)=\epsilon_F##
The limit itself is pretty easy to calculate
##lim_{T->0} \ lim_{\mu->\epsilon_F} \ (e^{\frac{(\epsilon_F - \mu)}{kT}}+1)^{-1} = \frac{1}{2}##

But I'm very confused about changing ##\epsilon_\vec{k}## to ##\epsilon_F##. Why do we do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depending on ##\epsilon_k## with comparison to Fermi energy as T ##\rightarrow## 0,
For ##\epsilon_k > \epsilon_f ## ##f \rightarrow ?##
For ##\epsilon_k < \epsilon_f ## ##f \rightarrow ?##
and
For ##\epsilon_k = \epsilon_f ## ##f = 1/2## for any temperature ##T \neq 0##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes mcas and DrClaude
I want to find the solution to the integral ##\theta = \int_0^{\theta}\frac{du}{\sqrt{(c-u^2 +2u^3)}}## I can see that ##\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} = A +Bu+Cu^2## is a Weierstrass elliptic function, which can be generated from ##\Large(\normalsize\frac{du}{d\theta}\Large)\normalsize^2 = c-u^2 +2u^3## (A = 0, B=-1, C=3) So does this make my integral an elliptic integral? I haven't been able to find a table of integrals anywhere which contains an integral of this form so I'm a bit stuck. TerryW

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K