Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the relationship between Fermi energy in three-dimensional (3D) systems and its counterpart in two-dimensional (2D) systems. Participants explore the mathematical expressions involved and the differences in calculating the Fermi radius in both dimensions.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant states that the relation for Fermi energy in 3D is given by E=h(cut square)k(square)/2m and seeks to find a corresponding relation for 2D.
- Another participant clarifies that the expression provided is not the Fermi energy but rather the dispersion relation for free electrons, noting that it can yield the Fermi energy when k equals k_F, the Fermi radius in k space.
- A participant introduces the formula for k_F in 2D as kf(square)=2 * pi *N /A, where N/A represents the number of electrons per unit area, and requests an explanation of the dispersion relation.
- Another participant explains the dispersion relation as the relationship between wave-vector and frequency, extending the concept to particles and discussing its significance in different media.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the initial expression as a dispersion relation versus Fermi energy, indicating a lack of consensus on the definitions and relationships involved.
Contextual Notes
Participants have not fully resolved the distinctions between the dispersion relation and Fermi energy, nor have they clarified the implications of the differences in dimensionality on these concepts.
Who May Find This Useful
This discussion may be of interest to those studying solid-state physics, quantum mechanics, or anyone looking to understand the differences in electron behavior in 2D versus 3D systems.