Is There a Simple Explanation for the Area Element in Fermi Normal Coordinates?

PLuz
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Defined the Fermi Normal Coordinates (which can be seen for example http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2011-7&page=articlese10.html" ) is there any heuristic argument to explain why the area element is something proportional to the element of solid angle? I was trying to find a way to avoid the need to compute explicitly the area element in order prove for the first and third results of Eq.17.26 of that reference...

Any ideas?


Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Surely it's because the 2 (or n? doesn't seem to matter)-sphere you're integrating over is a symmetric domain, and the integrand is always odd in at least one of the coordinates, so the integral has to vanish. The second result is the non-trivial one.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top