Fermion Current Commutators in 2 dimensions

EoinBrennan
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the current: J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x) = \overline{\psi_{L}}(t,x + \epsilon) \gamma^{0} \psi_{L}(t,x - \epsilon) = \psi_{L}^{\dagger} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L}(x - \epsilon) with \psi_{L} = \frac{1}{2} (1 - \gamma^{5}) \psi_{D}.

Use the canonical equal time commutation relations for fermions to compute the equal time commutator:
[J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)].

Homework Equations



Canonical equal time commutation relations:

\{\psi_{a} (x), \psi^{\dagger}_{b} (y)\} = i \delta^{3} (x - y) \delta_{a b}

\{\psi_{a} (x), \psi_{b} (y)\} = \{\psi^{\dagger}_{a} (x), \psi^{\dagger}_{b} (y)\} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



So [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] = \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)

From here I'm not sure what path to take.

\{ \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon), \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \} = i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \\ \Rightarrow \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} ( y + \epsilon) = i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} ( y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)

Subbing this into the commutation relation gives

i.e. [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] = \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) ( i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} ( y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) ( i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} ( x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon)) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)

With \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) = \frac{1}{2} \{ \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon), \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \} = 0, etc.

So now I have

[J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] = \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) ( i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon)) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) ( i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon)) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \\ = i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon)

Is this all correct?

Homework Statement



I am then asked to evaluate \langle 0 \vert [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] \vert 0 \rangle in the massless case, and the limit as \epsilon \rightarrow 0.

Homework Equations



I am given that \langle 0 \vert \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (t,x) \psi_{L} (t,y) \vert 0 \rangle = \frac{1}{x - y}.

The Attempt at a Solution



So \langle 0 \vert [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] \vert 0 \rangle = \langle 0 \vert i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) - i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \vert 0 \rangle \\ = \langle 0 \vert i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (x + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (y - \epsilon) \vert \rangle - \langle 0 \vert i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) \psi^{\dagger}_{L} (y + \epsilon) \psi_{L} (x - \epsilon) \vert 0 \rangle

I'm not quite sure how operators like \langle 0 \vert act on the \delta terms.

But it seems like the answer will be:

\langle 0 \vert [J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t,x), J^{\epsilon}_{0} (t, y)] \vert 0 \rangle = i \delta^{3} (x - y - 2 \epsilon) \frac{1}{x - y -2 \epsilon} - i \delta^{3} (y - x + 2 \epsilon) \frac{1}{y - x + 2 \epsilon}

As \epsilon \rightarrow 0 we get: \langle 0 \vert [J^{0}_{0} (t,x), J^{0}_{0} (t, y)] \vert 0 \rangle = i \delta^{3} (x - y) \frac{1}{x - y} - i \delta^{3} (y - x) \frac{1}{y - x}.

Is this = 0?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. I have very little support from my lecturer and I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed by Quantum Field Theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bumping this as it is the exact question I posted yesterday.
 
Bump
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top