MHB Ferrari's solution to the quartic

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmaniac1
  • Start date Start date
mathmaniac1
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
I hope its not bad to ask this.

wikipedia said:
The depressed quartic can be solved by means of a method discovered by Lodovico Ferrari. The depressed equation may be rewritten (this is easily verified by expanding the square and regrouping all terms in the left-hand side)
wikipedia said:
b692bead5cbf59bcdbc0699875161a2d.png
Then, we add a variable y to factor of the left-hand side. This amounts to add some expression to the left-hand side. We add thus the same expression to the right-hand side. After regrouping the coefficients of the power of u in the right-hand side, this gives the equation
549f3239c9359dcd9d2e988cba906203.png
which is equivalent to the original equation, whichever value is given to y.


As the value of y may be arbitrarily chosen, we will choose it in order to get a perfect square in the right-hand side. This implies that thediscriminant in u of this quadratic equation is zero, that is y is a root of the equation

What does that mean?

8497b88e1060cbbe181cfeb45583d7f1.png
which may be rewritten
991767a6bebbcb5bf1be694ca3f02f91.png
The value of y may thus be obtained from the formulas provided in cubic equation.
When y is a root of equation (4), the right-hand side of equation (3) the square of
348e62c5af1d54b08560a55d46220f4b.png


........

I also wonder how solving y which is an arbitary number will solve u...Can anyone explain the whole process,please?

Then I would be soooo thankful...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Ferarri's solution to the quartic

Hey mathmaniac! ;)

mathmaniac said:
What does that mean?

The quadratic equation of the right hand side is of the form $Au^2+Bu+C = 0$.
A perfect square is of the form $A(u-D)^2 = 0$.

This means that the solutions for u in this quadratic equation must be identical.
The solution of the quadratic equation is:
$$u=\frac{-B \pm \sqrt{B^2 - 4AC}}{2A}$$
If it only has one solution, then $B^2 - 4AC$ must be zero.
The expression $B^2 - 4AC$ is called the discriminant.

I also wonder how solving y which is an arbitary number will solve u...

Picking a special number for y, makes it easier to solve for u, since we will get an equation of the form
$$(u^2+\alpha+y)^2=A(u-D)^2$$
We can take the square root from both sides, leaving us with a regular quadratic equation.

Afterward, the real solution can be constructed from u and y.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top