Ferrite Bead Usage: How Much Is Too Much?

  • Thread starter Thread starter likephysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bead
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights concerns about the excessive use of ferrite beads in modern embedded system designs, particularly for ARM9-based boards. While some designers previously operated without ferrites and faced no compliance issues, the trend now leans towards incorporating them for every power rail, often without justification. This practice complicates PCB layouts and can lead to more filtering elements than necessary, driven by the desire to mitigate EMI concerns quickly. Designers are encouraged to adopt a cautious approach, starting with a robust design and gradually removing components, rather than simplifying and troubleshooting later. Ultimately, the cost of ferrite beads is minimal compared to the potential time lost in redesigns due to circuit failures.
likephysics
Messages
638
Reaction score
4
How much is too much, when it comes to using ferrites.
Some of the boards I designed previously did not even have single ferrite. We pretty much never used ferrites. Compliance was not a problem.
Now I design ARM9 based embedded system boards. There are ferrites for everything - NAND, DDR, CPU, CPU core. Are so many ferrites really needed?
worst of all, there is no justification. They continue to use it just because its been used previously or it was used in the reference schematic.
One ferrite after the power supply is great. But for every rail?
It basically creates split planes. So no single reference plane for high speed signals. Makes layout hard, specially when DDR2, NAND are present.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
EMI is difficult and very much experimental, so what one designer does results primarily from his habits.

Because EMI worries take so long to solve, and a ferrite bead or decoupling capacitor or voltage regulator is cheap, experimented designers use to put more than strictly needed, in accordance to hard-learned systematic practices, to save stress and time - and leave them in place when the design works, instead of trying each and every one.

As a result, typical designs have more filtering elements than needed. Possibly many more.

If you wish, you could try to suppress some and take the very long time to check if the circuit still works perfectly. Remember that a digital circuit's error-free operation is very long to check - at every supply drift and temperature and timing skew.

But don't first design a simplified PCB, run into trouble, and try to improve it later. Take the paranoid design first and remove gradually some elements instead. If not, you'll fail.

And you knwo what? I suggest that you evaluate how much the beads cost and how much time you'd waste (months and several runs of design+cable+test) if it runs wrongly.
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top