Feynman Diagrams: Weak Interaction Help

Monarch
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi all

Just a basic question really; I'm at university and have been tutoring someone through a couple of A level physics modules, and I'm covering some basic particle physics at the moment, which is all alright, but I've come to an issue with Feynman diagrams.

Basically, for interactions with either the W or Z bosons, how do you know which one to use? I know these bosons correspond to weak interactions, but is there any kind of methodology for working out which one? For the purpose of the exam back when I did it I just committed the few interactions we needed to know to memory, and this isn't something I've really met at uni yet!

Hope that makes sense

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The W bosons carry charge, and the Z boson does not, so you should be able to use conservation of charge to determine which boson takes part in any given process.
 
Thanks for the reply!

That makes sense but I'm struggling to work it out in my head properly. The main ones required are beta minus and beta plus decays. In beta minus, with this diagram
http://www.barnsley.org/penistone-grammar/science/Images/feynman_1.jpg

the exchange particle is a W-, so where does the charge conservation come from (other than the overall conservation with the proton and electron cancelling each other out)?

Apologies if this is basic, it was taught very badly at my school and it's not something I've really had to do since.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Charge conservation happens at every vertex. You have a neutron coming in on the left, which is charge 0. A proton exits, which is of charge +1, so the boson must have charge -1 in order for things to balance. So you know it must be a W-. It then decays into an electron (charge -1), and an electron antineutrino (charge 0), meaning that charge is conserved at that vertex as well.

It wouldn't make sense for the proton-neutron vertex to give off a W+ or a Z, because then the total charge wouldn't be conserved. Similarly, it wouldn't make sense for the W- to decay into a positron + electron neutrino, for the same reason.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top