Is Feynman's Statistical Mechanics Suitable for a First Introduction?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the suitability of Richard Feynman's book "Statistical Mechanics; A set of lectures" as a first introduction to the subject of statistical mechanics. Participants explore the book's content, style, and appropriateness for beginners in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Feynman's lectures are enjoyable and colorful but may only be clear if the reader is adequately prepared.
  • Another participant emphasizes that they seek comments specifically related to the text, pointing out its terse and mathematical style compared to more general undergraduate lectures.
  • A different participant praises the book as marvelous but asserts that it is not suitable for use as an introductory textbook.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on whether the book is suitable for beginners, with some participants suggesting it is not appropriate for an introductory level while others highlight its engaging style.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the material, which may influence their perspectives on the book's accessibility for newcomers to statistical mechanics.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
I found this little book titled “Statistical Mechanics; A set of lectures” by Feynman in the library. I’m not taking Stat Mech until Easter so I’d just be reading for interest at this stage, although the content looks fairly involved. Is it suitable for a first introduction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
I found this little book titled “Statistical Mechanics; A set of lectures” by Feynman in the library. I’m not taking Stat Mech until Easter so I’d just be reading for interest at this stage, although the content looks fairly involved. Is it suitable for a first introduction?
I think that in general, Feynman is perspicuous if and only if you're adequately prepared. His lectures are fun to browse around in even if you're not very well-prepared, because his expositions are so colorful. But that's maybe rather like looking at an illustrated book written in a foreign language that you don't know.
 
Thanks, although I'm looking for focused comments specific to this text. Its style has little resemblance to the more well-known set of general undergraduate lectures (it's far more terse and mathematical).
 
It's a marvelous book as all of Feynman's textbooks (I mean the real textbooks, not so much the popular-science books), but it's definitely not for use as an introductory textbook.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog and ergospherical

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K