Quantum Is Feynman's Statistical Mechanics Suitable for a First Introduction?

Click For Summary
"Statistical Mechanics; A Set of Lectures" by Feynman is recognized for its engaging style and depth, but it is not considered suitable as an introductory textbook for beginners. The content is described as terse and mathematical, differing significantly from more accessible undergraduate materials. While Feynman's lectures are enjoyable and colorful, they require a solid foundation in the subject to be fully appreciated. Therefore, readers without prior knowledge may find the book challenging, making it more appropriate for those who have already been introduced to the concepts of statistical mechanics.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
I found this little book titled “Statistical Mechanics; A set of lectures” by Feynman in the library. I’m not taking Stat Mech until Easter so I’d just be reading for interest at this stage, although the content looks fairly involved. Is it suitable for a first introduction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
I found this little book titled “Statistical Mechanics; A set of lectures” by Feynman in the library. I’m not taking Stat Mech until Easter so I’d just be reading for interest at this stage, although the content looks fairly involved. Is it suitable for a first introduction?
I think that in general, Feynman is perspicuous if and only if you're adequately prepared. His lectures are fun to browse around in even if you're not very well-prepared, because his expositions are so colorful. But that's maybe rather like looking at an illustrated book written in a foreign language that you don't know.
 
Thanks, although I'm looking for focused comments specific to this text. Its style has little resemblance to the more well-known set of general undergraduate lectures (it's far more terse and mathematical).
 
It's a marvelous book as all of Feynman's textbooks (I mean the real textbooks, not so much the popular-science books), but it's definitely not for use as an introductory textbook.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog and ergospherical
Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying to figure out what it means. So here comes the split, do I get a complex analysis book? Or a calculus book? I might be able to Borrow a calculus textbook from my math teacher study that for a bit and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K