Feynman's description of angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
Feynman's Messenger Lectures on angular momentum emphasize its relationship to areal velocity, suggesting that angular momentum can be interpreted as areal velocity multiplied by 2m. The discussion raises the question of whether the equation dA/dt = L/2m holds universally, with some participants noting that if L is proportional to areal velocity, so are multiples of L. A mathematical explanation is provided, showing that the area swept out by a radial vector can be derived from the cross product of position vectors. The conversation highlights the clarity of Feynman's geometric approach to understanding angular momentum, which contrasts with traditional teaching methods. This perspective invites further exploration of why such intuitive explanations are not more widely adopted in physics education.
stingray191
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I recently watched the Feynman Messenger Lectures on project tuva. I hope some of you have watched the second video lecture in the collection or will watch it in order to help me with my following question :smile:. In this lecture Feynman talks about angular momentum in terms of the time rate of change of the area swept out by the radial vector. That is, angular momentum is proportional to the areal velocity. I've always had trouble intuitively understanding angular momentum but feynman's geometrical description made sense to me and seemed simple. My question is this: Is interpreting angular momentum as being equal to the areal velocity times 2m valid in general? And if yes, then why is this way not taught in physics courses? Any answers would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, because if L, the magnitude of angular momentum, is proportional to the areal velocity, then so is 2L, 3L, and so forth.
 
I meant that does the equation dA/dt=L/2m hold in general where da/dt is the areal velocity.
 
"Leaning Towah!"

I haven't gone through all of his lectures yet but they are very entertaining. I never knew his accent was that strong though.
 
Consider a function r(t) (assume it is smooth or at least twice differentiable since we are considering a natural trajectory)

The area the function sweeps out from t to t+dt is dA=.5r(t)\times r(t+dt) this is because he area will be an infinitesimal triangle with the sides as vectors r(t) and r(t+dt) and it is well known that the area of a triangle defined by two "side" vectors is one half times the cross product of the vectors. See the graph below I made( dA is the yellow region)
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/614/areavelocity.jpg
Therefore, dA is equal to

\frac{dA}{dt}=.5\frac{r(t)\times r(t+dt)}{dt}=.5r(t)\times \frac{r(t+dt)}{dt}=.5r(t)\times v(t)

Obviously dA/dt (areal velocity) is proportional to angular momentum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top