Fick's 1st/2nd Law: Explaining the Sign Difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
Fick's 1st law includes a negative sign because it describes steady-state diffusion, where concentration decreases with distance from a source. In contrast, Fick's 2nd law does not have a negative sign as it accounts for concentration changes over time, which can increase or decrease. The diffusion coefficient (D) in Fick's 1st law is constant due to the steady-state condition, while in Fick's 2nd law, D is variable as it relates to non-steady state diffusion. The discussion also touches on the dependence of the diffusion constant on physical parameters and the boundary conditions for the applicability of both laws. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately applying Fick's laws in various diffusion scenarios.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
Why does Fick's 1st law have a negative sign in the equation, but Fick's
2nd law doesn't?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
also one more question:
Why's the D in Fick's 1st law a constant, but a variable in Fick's 2nd law?
 
hmm

far from an expert, but here is my best guess

for your first question:

in the 1st law, we're looking at steady state diffusion, and how the concentrations vary with respect to position

so, the concentration of the other substance will be decreasing as you go further and furthery away from it, hence the negative sign

in the 2nd law, we are looking at concertration with respect to time and it may be increasing or decreasing
for your second question:

the 1st law is used for steady state diffusion (concentration does not change with respect to time), that's why D is a constant

2nd law is used for non-steady state diffusion, where the concentration does depend on time,
 
wow! thank you very much! I've been thinking about that question for many days...
 
what kind of diffusion constants do you know? what physical parameters does the diffusion constant depend on?
 
what are the boundary condition of the validity of fick's first and 2nd law?
 
Back
Top