Fiction hypothetical about axial rotations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of a fictional planet having a moon that alternates between showing its near and far sides to observers on the planet, rather than being tidally locked in the traditional sense. The writer seeks to understand if a gradual rotation could create an effect similar to lunar phases, where the moon's visibility shifts over cycles. The concept of a "wobbly rotation" is introduced, suggesting a non-static appearance of the moon. Participants mention that while tidal locking typically stabilizes over time, there is room for creative interpretation in fiction. The example of Mercury's 3:2 tidal locking is suggested as a potential model for this scenario, indicating that some variations in orbital dynamics could allow for the desired effect.
Lapsangtea
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I am a fiction writer with a hypothetical question.

For my work I have a new planet, the same size as Earth, with a moon with just a very slightly longer mean orbit (a few days). I have been reading about tidal locking which ensures that observers on the planet only see the nearest side of the moon.

However I am asking whether it is possible to have an axial rotation that appears to 'alternate' with each cycle. For instance, for moon cycle 1 around the planet we would see the near side which would gradually rotate until cycle 2, when we see the far side which would gradually rotate until cycle 3, back to the near, and for cycle 4 we're back to the far, and so on and so forth alternating between each. I'm not talking about turning the satellite around as rapidly as a coin flip, but a kind of gradual change much like the changing lunar phases. I'm also asking about this with respect to the point of view from the planet below (so I know that a tidally-locked moon is actually rotating with respect to the planet, even though it appears 'static'). I think this would mean a kind of wobbly rotation, wouldn't it?

Is this possible and what, if anything, could cause this? I understand it often takes a very, very long time for satellites to 'stabilise'. Perhaps this effect would be impossible to reproduce? Wouldn't it just mean having a faster rotation than being tidally locked??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi(gh) Tea, :welcome:

Tidal locking takes a few years so set, so you have a bit of artistic freedom there :smile:
 
How about 3:2 tidal locking, like Mercury? Opposite side to Sun on each orbit.
 
BvU said:
Hi(gh) Tea

Ahahaha!
Thank you for pointing out the Mercury example as well.
 
A map of a four-dimensional planet is three dimensional, so such can exist in our Universe. I made one and posted a video to the Internet. This is all based on William Kingdon Clifford's math from the 19th century. It works like this. A 4D planet has two perpendicular planes of rotation. The intersection of such a plane with the surface of the planet is a great circle. We can define latitude as the arctan( distance from one plane/distance from the other plane). The set of all points...
Back
Top