Field inside a cavity inside a conductor

AI Thread Summary
In a conductor with a cavity, the electric field inside the cavity is zero when uncharged. However, introducing equal and opposite charges (+q and -q) in the cavity complicates the scenario, as Laplace's equation is not satisfied everywhere due to the presence of point charges. This means the first uniqueness theorem cannot be applied in the same way. While the uniqueness theorem still allows for a unique potential function V(r), it will not be constant throughout the conductor. The discussion highlights the complexities of applying electrostatic principles in non-uniform charge distributions.
Kolahal Bhattacharya
Messages
133
Reaction score
1
In the context of properties of conductor & 1st Uniqueness theorem, Griffiths proves that field inside a cavity( empty of charge) within a conductor is 0.
Is the result same if we place a +q & a -q (so that Q(enc)=0)
suspended in air inside the cavity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say no, because Laplace's equation won't be satisfied everywhere, because of the point charges. So you can't apply the first uniqueness theorem.
 
I agree with you about the result but cannot be satisfied with your argument.As Poisson's eqn. takes into consideration Rho(r)...& still satisfies Uniqueness theorems. Lastly I think it is solved:we will have a unique V(r) function from which E follows.This V(r) will not satisfy properti--es of Laplace eqn.In boundary, V(r)=V(0),Following properties of a conductor...Otherwise the system I'm talking of will not exist at all.It will collapse immediately after we place them together within the cavity,following Earnshaw's theorem.Any conceptual mistake?Please help!
 
Yeah, you're right, the uniqueness theorem still holds and the potential can be uniquely determined, but it won't be constant inside the conductor.

Also, I don't understand why you say V(R) = V(0)?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top