Field of non-uniformly charged ring

skyrolla
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thin rubber ring of radius R lies in the xy-plane and is centered at the origin. The ring carries line charge density λ=λo*sin(Ø), with a constant λo with units C/m. define tan(Ø)=y/x. Calculate the magnitude and direction of the electric field E(z) created by the ring on points on the positive z axis.



Homework Equations



E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Symmetry implies only the component Ez will be nonzero along the z axis.
Desiring to integrate over Ø, my limits of integration will be 0 to pi.

Now dE=k*dq/r^2 with r=(R^2+z^2).

Q/R=λo*sin(Ø) so dQ=R*λo*cos(Ø) dØ

and dEz= k*R*λo*cos(Ø) dØ/(R^2+z^2)

however, integrating this over Ø results in multiplying everything by sin(pi)-sin(0) = 0, so clearly I've made at least one mistake here.

All help is appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
the result must be zero for the sake of symmetri. Your result is correct (I think)
 
Symmetry in the x and y directions makes sense, as an equal amount of ring and angle phi are distributed to both the positive and negative halves. However the field would certainly have a Z component at points along the Z axis, as the full ring exerts charge in either a positive or negative z direction.
 
the charge is ditributed in iqual amount in each semi-circle but with defferent signs, so symmetry implies that the z component must be zero. However I now realize that there must be a component in the x-y plane
 
skyrolla said:
Desiring to integrate over Ø, my limits of integration will be 0 to pi.

I think you should draw a picture...the angle \phi[/itex] is measured entirely in the xy-plane, and any point on the ring is given by x=R\cos\phi, y=R\sin\phi and z=0.<br /> <br /> If the ring is an entire circle, the limits on \phi will be zero to 2\pi<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> Now dE=k*dq/r^2 with r=(R^2+z^2). <br /> <br /> Q/R=λo*sin(Ø) so dQ=R*λo*cos(Ø) dØ </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> Not quite. By definition of linear charge density, dq=\lambda ds=\lambda_0 \sin\phi Rd\phi<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> and dEz= k*R*λo*cos(Ø) dØ/(R^2+z^2) </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> No, not only should the cosine be a sine, but you haven&#039;t properly selected the z-component of d\textbf{E}.<br /> <br /> Again, draw a picture...the field d\textbf{E} from a tiny piece of the ring points from that piece, to the point on the z-axis at which it is measured...you want to find the z-component of that vector.<br /> <br /> Even after you do the calculation properly, you will still find that E_z=0, however, if you also calculate the other components you should find that E_y\neq0.
 
Thanks. After figuring out I had the wrong component, I was able to solve the problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top