Can Scalar and YM Lagrangians Be Written Using Tetrads and Spin Connection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields General
Dox
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hi everybody!

I'm studing some classical field theory in general backgrounds. Of course the most beautiful way of doing so is using differential forms. For example, the lagrangian density of a massless scalar field would be
L_{\phi}=d\phi\wedge * d\phi,​
while the lagrangian density for a YM field is
L_{YM}=\left<d_A A\wedge *d_A A\right>.​

However, once one is interested in adding spinors, tetrads (and spin connection) enter into action...
L_{\psi}=\epsilon_{abcd}\bar{\psi}\Gamma^a e^b e^c e^d (d+\omega)\psi,​
with e^{a} the tetrad 1-form and \omega
the spin-connection 1-form.

Although all lagrangian densities are coordinate independent, they are written in different ways... Is there a form of writing the first two using tetrads and spin connection?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
</code>Yes, there is a way to write the first two lagrangian densities using tetrads and spin connection. The lagrangian density of a massless scalar field can be written as:L_{\phi} = e^{a} \wedge *(e_a \wedge d\phi)where e^{a} is the tetrad 1-form and * denotes the Hodge dual.The lagrangian density for a YM field can be written as:L_{YM}=\left<e^{a}\wedge *F_{ab}\wedge e^b\right>, where F_{ab} is the curvature 2-form associated with the spin connection 1-form, \omega. Hope this helps!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top