Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Filtering certain wavelengths from the camera RGB videostream

  1. Feb 1, 2010 #1

    We are using ordinary CCTV cameras to grab color pictures. The representation of the picture in our image processing application is in RGB format.

    Is it possible to determine wavelength of the light at particular pixel from RGB values ? The purpose is to cut out all the white light and keep only infrared spectrum (above 850nm). We need software solution, because hardware solution (like IR pass filters on lenses) is not acceptable for us.

    Thanks for your advices.
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 1, 2010 #2
    bandpass filter
  4. Feb 1, 2010 #3
    We can't use hardware filters. Our solution must be done completely in a software.

    When the RED light comes to the CCD sensor, the CCD produces value RGB=[255,0,0], the GREEN light is [0,255,0] and so on ...

    The problem is that when IR light of frequency approximately 850-900 nm comes to the CCD sensor, the sensor sees the light as a grayscale, that meas RGB value is for instance [5,5,5].

    We are looking for a mathematical formula, using which we will be able to convert RGB value into the wavelength.

    That means RGB value of [255,0,0] will be converted to 700 nm for instance, and RGB value infrared light will be converted to 850 nm.
  5. Feb 1, 2010 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I don't think what you are wanting to do is possible with a RGB signal.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RGB_color_model" [Broken]

    Not only that, but red is visible red not infrared.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  6. Feb 1, 2010 #5
    A software solution is not possible. The information isn't there...you don't know anything about the specific wavelengths the illumination is composed of, only the total intensity of illumination in three bands (for a color camera) from the visual range. Any IR signal is contamination that got through the color filters and is indistinguishable from visible light.

    It's not an issue of it being hard or computationally expensive, that information just doesn't exist in the output of the camera. Your only options are to use a real hardware IR-pass filter on the camera, or to do something completely different from what you described.
  7. Feb 2, 2010 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    There is some very muddled thinking going on here.
    For a start, the basic answer to the question is no.
    The following only applies to additive (TV, type) colour reproduction: film is messy and different.
    Colour imaging systems use three sensors with analysis curves which are definitely not just 'Red', 'Green' and 'Blue'. All three sensors cover a wide range of wavelengths and match, as closely as practicable, the eye's response with its three colour sensors.
    See this Wikki link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIE_1931_color_space. You percieve a colour (note- not wavelength) because of the relative levels of the signals from the three (very broad band) sensors. These signals are not called RGB but xyz - they are reddish, greenish and bluish, if you like but R, G and B signals only emerge from the process when you want to synthesise a colour. Many different combinations of light of different wavelengths will give you the same subjective 'colour' response. There is no reason to expect to perceive infra red as equal combinations of R,G and B - there is zero response of the blue(ish) sensors to i.r..

    It is possible to synthesise colours which will match the original, subjectively, using suitable combinations of levels of Red, Green and Blue light (Primaries), produced by, say, the phosphors on a TV screen and added together. To get a bright picture, these primaries may well not be 'spot' wavelengths. The RGB signals from the camera (etc) represent the signal which need to be applied to three phosphors (or equivalent) to produce the desired colour sensation.

    If you are told that a certain RGB combination was produced from a single wavelength of light then you can work out that wavelength (Look at the CIE chart on the Wikki link) - but other parts of a real picture could have the same RGB combination. So you could not say that you could 'filter' out a particular wavelength - just eliminate a certain colour.

    You could identify areas of a picture which were dominated by 'generally far red' signals, where X is much higher than Y and Z, but that's all.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook