Filters for Co K radiation are usually made of iron oxide power

slo43
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
"filters for Co K radiation are usually made of iron oxide power. If a filter contains 5 mg Fe2O3, what is the transmission factor for the Co K(alpa) line? What is the intensity ratio of Co K(alpha) to Co K(beta) in the filtered beam?"

I was wondering if you could expand further as I'm stuck. I found mass absorption for Fe2O3 alpha =44.61 cm2/g and beta = 245.7 cm2/g. but since I'm not given density of fe2o3 do i just presume (5.24g/cm3) it or can i do the maths and solve without it. your help is welcomed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
. The transmission factor for the Co K(alpha) line will depend on the thickness of the filter. In order to calculate this, you will need to know the density of the Fe2O3 powder as well as the mass of 5mg. With these two pieces of information, you can calculate the thickness of the filter and then use the mass absorption coefficients to calculate the transmission factor.The intensity ratio of Co K(alpha) to Co K(beta) in the filtered beam can be calculated using the mass absorption coefficients for alpha and beta. You would divide the mass absorption coefficient for alpha by the mass absorption coefficient for beta to get the intensity ratio.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top