Final velocity after distance given acceleration with respect to time

AI Thread Summary
To find the final velocity of an object given its acceleration function a(t) = A(eBt-eCt)², the integral of acceleration must be taken over time, specifically from 0 to te, where te is the time at which the object covers the distance d. The challenge lies in determining te or converting the acceleration function to a position function a(x) for integration with respect to distance. It is crucial to apply initial conditions to the integral to accurately determine the velocity and position functions. The integration process involves summing infinitesimal changes, which requires careful handling of constants and initial values. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving the problem correctly.
Integrated
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given an equation for the acceleration of an object with respect to time a(t). I know that it will be accelerating over a certain distance d, after starting at rest. How do I find the final velocity that this object has reached after traveling the distance d?


Homework Equations


The given equation for a(t) is:
a(t) = A(eBt-eCt)2
Where A, B, and C are known constants, and t is time.


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that to find this final velocity I would use this equation:
vf = ∫a(t)dt from 0 to te, the time at which the object reaches the distance d. I am stuck trying to find te, or at least some conversion to acceleration with respect to position a(x), so that I could integrate from 0 to d.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't learned much calculus, but I am curious, why can't you solve for t_e like this?

∫∫a(t_e)=d

(I don't know if that's the correct way to write the second integral)

Thank you if someone replies, and sorry if this wasn't helpful.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Integrated, you're not quite right on that function. It works in this case, but only because it starts from rest.

In general:

##\vec{v} = \frac{d\vec{x}}{dt}##
##\vec{a} = \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt} = \frac{d^2\vec{x}}{dt^2}##

And backwards it's

##\vec{\Delta v} = \int_{a}^b \vec{a}(t)dt##
##\vec{\Delta x} = \int_{a}^b \vec{v}(t)dt##

Notice that when you do it backwards like so, you get the total change in velocity or position. This is because when you integrate, you're summing up infinitesimal changes.

If you want the position/velocity function, you have to apply initial conditions, meaning you have to add that +C at the end of your integral and actually solve for it (generally based on some function value at t =0)

Basically, I think you and Nathanael have it right, I just wanted to clarify something I saw as a conceptual misunderstanding.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top