Final Velocity of a Spaceship Approaching Earth from Infinity Due to Gravity

AI Thread Summary
A discussion on calculating the final velocity of a spaceship approaching Earth from infinity focuses on the gravitational force and the equations of motion. The user correctly identifies the need to set the mass times acceleration equal to the gravitational force and separates variables for integration. The integral is set up to find velocity as a function of distance, with the limits of integration from infinity to the Earth's surface. Participants confirm that the limits should indeed reflect the radius of the Earth and caution about the correct use of signs in the equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent units and careful integration to arrive at the final velocity.
Luke1121
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Assuming the Earth is at rest and alone in the universe what speed would a spaceship arriving at the surface of Earth from an infinitley large distance be if the speed at infinity= 0 and acceleration is caused only by gravity


Homework Equations


F= \frac{GmM}{x^2}
Also using the chain rule a=v\frac{dv}{dx}


The Attempt at a Solution



well I set ma equal to the force due to gravity so

v\frac{dv}{dx}= \frac{GM}{x^2}

seperating the variables gives vdv=\frac{GM}{x^2}dx

then

\int vdv=GM\int x^{-2} dx

would the limits of integration need to be from infinity to the surface of the earth, or am i on the wrong track all together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're doing fine. Just do the integral as you suggest.
 
You're on the right track. But you might need to be careful with signs. [Edit: I see haruspex beat me :smile:]
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok, then doing the indefinite integral gives v=\sqrt{\frac{2GM}{x}} + C

but I'm not sure about the limits, would it be \frac{1}{2}v^2=-GM\int_{\infty}^{6370}x^{-2}

where 6370 is the radius of the Earth in km?
Thanks
 
Luke1121 said:
Ok, then doing the indefinite integral gives v=\sqrt{\frac{2GM}{x}} + C

but I'm not sure about the limits, would it be \frac{1}{2}v^2=-GM\int_{\infty}^{6370}x^{-2}

where 6370 is the radius of the Earth in km?
Thanks
The limit is the radius of the Earth. What units you use are up to you, so long as you are consistent. I would think your value for G assumes m, not km.
I think you have a sign wrong above. The minus sign should only appear after performing the integral.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top