Find 12th Term in Simple Sequence: 1,4,9,16...

  • Thread starter Thread starter ila
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
AI Thread Summary
The sequence 1, 4, 9, 16 represents the perfect squares, where each term is the square of its position in the sequence. The 12th term is 144, as confirmed by the formula n^2. An alternative approach suggests adding consecutive odd numbers to generate the same sequence, highlighting that multiple algorithms can produce the same initial terms. This leads to the conclusion that while various methods can be proposed, they may ultimately yield the same result, reinforcing the relationship between perfect squares and the sum of odd numbers. Understanding these connections clarifies the generation of such sequences.
ila
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If there is a sequence of numbers 1,4,9,16... what is the 12th term in the sequence (where 1 is the first term). The textbook says that it is 144 since each term of the sequence is the square of the term value. I find (and have always found) this to be confusing, why can't an alternate algorithm generate those few numbers, namely add 3 for the first term, five to the second term, 7 to the second term. Now there there appears to me an obvious pattern, the amount that one is adding to each term is increasing by 2 in the number of terms. I still haven't figured out an expression for the nth term for this alternative though. The general point though is this, with these sequences if we have given only a few numbers why can't we propose many different algorithms and then suggest that that is the correct generating process?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1. There are uncountably many integer sequences that continue the partial sequence you were given.
2. Your sequence happens to be the same as your teacher's: the squares are the sum of consecutive odd numbers!
 
You are certainly correct that there are other algorithms that would generate this same sequence for the first few terms. So strictly speaking the next number could be anything. Ironically though if you continue you the sequence with your pattern you will arrive at exactly the same sequence the book does, namely the perfect squares. And it is not too terribly difficult to prove this fact, that the sum of the first n odd numbers is n^2.
 
d_leet said:
Ironically though if you continue you the sequence with your pattern you will arrive at exactly the same sequence the book does, namely the perfect squares. And it is not too terribly difficult to prove this fact, that the sum of the first n odd numbers is n^2.
I had a sinking suspicion that that may have been the case.
 
All you have to do is see that n^2 = ((n-1) +1)^2 = (n-1)^2+2(n-1)+1 = (n-1)^2 + (2n-1). So that, 1, 1+3=4, 4+5=9, 9+7= 16. So that each term increases by the next odd number, and is a square.

Thus the nth term is \sum_1^n (2j-1)=n^2.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
81K
Back
Top