Find a Book About Prime Number Distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Treadstone 71
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
Recommendations for books on prime number distribution include "The Distribution Of Prime Numbers" by A.E. Ingham, noted for its thorough yet advanced exposition. Other suggestions are "The Prime Numbers and their Distribution" by Tenenbaum for a more introductory approach, and Davenport's "Multiplicative Number Theory" along with Apostol's "Introduction to Analytic Number Theory" for deeper insights. "Analytic Number Theory" by Iwaniec and Kowalski is highlighted as a comprehensive resource, albeit challenging for beginners. Readers are encouraged to preview books at libraries to assess their suitability, as some works, like Guy's "Unsolved Problems In Number Theory," can be discouraging despite their depth.
Treadstone 71
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for a book that will do a thorough exposition of everything we know about the distribution of primes. Can anyone recommend one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
'The Distribution Of Prime Numbers' - A.E.Ingham is pretty good, but then it's the only one I've used so there may be better suggestions out there..
 
I don't think there is a book that contains "everything".

Ingham's book is old, but also one of my favorites, it's a great introduction though at an advanced level. "The Prime Numbers and their distribution" by Tenenbaum, et al. is a nice book as well, more on an introductory level but still covering a good range of topics.

Almost all number theory texts beyond the "elementary" ones will have info on the distribution of primes. Davenport's "Multiplicative Number theory" and Apostols "Introduction to Analytic Number Theory" are good. "Analytic Number Theory" by Iwaniec and Kowalski is a phenomenal resource for all things related to it's title, though perhaps not the easiest to learn about a topic from scratch.

Guy's "Unsolved Problems In Number Theory" is self explanatory. It usually gives the most current results on a topic and will provide ample references.

If you plan to buy a book, you should go to the library and try to read some of it first to see if it's at an appropriate level.
 
Thanks for the suggestions. I've discovered a book called "Prime Numbers: The Most Mysterious Figures in Math" which I really like. It may sound like a popularized math book, but it's actually like "Unsolved Problems in Number Theory" by Guy, though it lists topics that are solved and unsolved. "The New Book of Prime Number Records" is pretty good too.

Guy's book is very discouraging to read. At the end of many sections, he often includes a remark like "it is unlikely that this problem will be solved within our lifetime".
 
In number theory, hundreds and thousands of pages of work can result in reducing an exponent by a minuscule amount and still you seem hopelessly distant from what is believed to be the truth.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top