Find a rectangular equation for the surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter stevecallaway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rectangular Surface
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a rectangular equation for a surface defined by the vector function r(u,v) = u i + v j + (1/2)v k. Participants are exploring the relationship between the parameters u, v, and the Cartesian coordinates x, y, z.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to express the vector function in terms of x, y, and z, noting that x = u and y = v, leading to z = (1/2)v. Questions arise regarding the elimination of parameters and the relationship between y and z.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest a relationship between y and z, specifically y = 2z, and question whether this relationship is sufficient to express the surface equation. There is recognition of the distinction between parametric and scalar forms of the equation, with some guidance provided on interpreting the vector representation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the variable u being independent and how it affects the overall equation of the surface. The discussion reflects on the nature of the surface being cylindrical, as indicated by the relationship found.

stevecallaway
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


r(u,v)=u i +v j +(1/2)v k


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


x=u : y=v : z=(1/2)v
because x=u and y=v, x & y are the parameters
so r(x,y)=x+y+(1/2)y=x+(3/2)y
but the answer says it is y-2z=0. What am I not seeing correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stevecallaway said:

Homework Statement


r(u,v)=u i +v j +(1/2)v k

x=u : y=v : z=(1/2)v
because x=u and y=v, x & y are the parameters
so r(x,y)=x+y+(1/2)y=x+(3/2)y

But r is given as a vector, so this last equation makes no sense. What you want to do is eliminate the u,v,w variables as much as possible. Do you see a relation between y and z? And it looks like y and z don't depend on x...
 
I think I see a relation between y and z and that is y=2z. So is that all that I'm supposed to do is find a relationship from among the original equation and have that equal to zero? Because y-2z=0 is supposed to be the answer, but what happens to the u i?
 
The vector parametric form is one way to write the equation of a surface. An equation of the form f(x,y,z)=0 is another way. The parametric way is written as a vector function and the other way as a scalar equation. Your vector representation is equivalent to your three equations: x=u, y=v, z=(1/2)v. In this case there is the relation y = 2z which is independent of x, which can be anything. You would normally write the equation y = 2z. The other variable, which is now missing, can be anything. This is characteristic of a cylindrical surface -- it is just the plane formed by taking the line y = 2z in the zy plane and extending or "sweeping" it in the x direction.

[Edit] typos
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K