Find a root for this expression:

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaxwellPhill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression Root
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a root for the expression cos(x) + cos(ix) + cos(x*i^3/2) + cos(x*i^1/2) = 0. Participants express skepticism about the existence of an analytic root, suggesting that it may not exist. A numerical approximation of a root is provided as 1.4405686011239758 - 3.477840254362339i, derived from 3D plots and the FindRoot function in Mathematica. The conversation also touches on the limitations of existing trigonometric identities for solving the equation. Overall, the consensus leans towards the complexity of the problem and the likelihood of a complex root.
MaxwellPhill
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
cos(x)+cos(ix)+cos(x*i^3/2)+cos(x*i^1/2)=0 for x

I have spent a lot of time finding an analytic root to this equation without success. An analytic root may not exist. I don't know. It is roughly equal to (8facorial)^(1/8)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think there is an anaylitical solution and I am not sure that there even is a root.

x = 0 is closer than your x = 3.764350600, but that's only taken it down to 4 rather than 8.0003108.
 
Hmm..I ust realized for the expression above the root must be complex of the form i^1/4.

Trig functions of the form cosx+cosy =0 can be solved because of the product formula:

cos(x)+cox(y)=2*(cos((x+y)/2))*(cos((x-y)/2)))

but is there such a formula for cos(x)+cos(y)+cos(z) ?
 
I did some 3D Plots in mathematica to get a rough idea where a root might be and then used the FindRoot function and got that 1.4405686011239758 - 3.477840254362339i is approximatly a root.

I don't think there is any simplification like you want.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top