Find acceleration component to hit target in 2D plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration component needed for a ship in a 2D plane to hit a target point, given an initial velocity and constant acceleration without gravity. The problem is likened to projectile motion but complicated by the ship's maximum speed and the need to transform the scenario to a simpler coordinate system. It is suggested that under constant acceleration, the ship follows a parabolic trajectory, and constructing a parametric representation may help identify the required path. However, the presence of a speed limit complicates the solution, potentially leading to the need for numerical methods or iterative solutions. Ultimately, the conclusion points towards solving a quartic equation or utilizing a pursuit curve method for practical implementation in a game setting.
nook79
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi. Me and my dad (math teacher) are having some trouble finding the answer to a seemingly fairly easy problem.

It is somewhat similar to projectile trajectory math but with the difference that the projectile have an initial velocity and there's no gravity, only acceleration.

Imagine the game Asteroids. The ship is floating at a certain velocity (x, y).
The ship can accelerate in any direction to move. The acceleration force is constant.
What I want is to find the acceleration component (or angle of acceleration vector) so that the ship will hit a defined target point (x, y).

I can offset all positions and angles so that the ship is at position (0, 0) and the target is at (x, 0) to make calculation easier.
One tricky part is that the ship has a maximum speed (magnitude of velocity component), but the initial velocity can be anything between 0 and maximum speed.

I'd be really happy to see some solution for this, with or without maximum speed of the ship.

Please ask if I'm unclear!

Thanks
Mattias
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would transform the problem into the initial rest frame of the ship. But with acceleration, especially non constant acceleration (speed limit) there might be no analytical solution. If this is for a computer game, you can solve it numerically by iteration.
 
Under constant acceleration, an object always follows a parabolic trajectory. Just construct the parametric representation of a general parabolic trajectory that has the pre-defined initial position and velocity, and then solve which one of these parabolas goes through the target point.

EDIT: if there's a speed limit, this does not work in all cases
 
Last edited:
Thanks! Sorry for the late reply, the response notification ended up in my trash box.

We came to the conclusion that I would have to solve a quartic equation (even without speed limit), and since it's not really one ship but thousands of particles updating at 60 fps I think I'll have to stick with my current pursuit curve like method.

I'll check out the parabolic trajectory suggestion first though. :)

cheers
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top