MHB Find all functions satisfying f(mn)=f(m)f(n), and m+n|f(m)+f(n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding functions f: ℕ → ℕ that satisfy the equations f(mn) = f(m)f(n) and m+n | f(m) + f(n) for all natural numbers m and n. Participants note that odd powers of n exhibit this property, suggesting a relationship between the equations and polynomial forms. There is uncertainty about whether the identified solutions are exhaustive. A typo in the suggested solution is also mentioned, indicating a need for clarification. The conversation emphasizes the exploration of functional equations within number theory.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Find all functions, $f: \mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{N}$, satisfying

\[f(mn)=f(m)f(n),\: \: \: and \: \: \: m+n \: \: |\: \: f(m)+f(n)\]for all $m,n \in \mathbb{N}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Find all functions, $f: \mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{N}$, satisfying

\[f(mn)=f(m)f(n),\: \: \: and \: \: \: m+n \: \: |\: \: f(m)+f(n)\]for all $m,n \in \mathbb{N}$.

by putting m = 1 we get $f(n) = f(1) f(n)$ so $f(1) = 1$

now 1 + n is a factor of 1 + f(n) so by inspection f(n) = n. I do not have a proof of the same
 
Last edited:
kaliprasad said:
by putting m = 1 we get $f(n) = f(1) f(n)$ so $f(1) = 1$

now 1 + n is a factor of 1 + f(n) so by inspection f(n) = n. I do not have a proof of the same
[sp]Odd powers of $n$ also have this property: $(mn)^k = m^kn^k$, and $(m+n)^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^k)$ if $k$ is an odd integer.

I have not thought about whether these are the only solutions.
[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Odd powers of $n$ also have this property: $(mn)^k = m^kn^k$, and $(m+n)^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^k)$ if $k$ is an odd integer.

I have not thought about whether these are the only solutions.
[/sp]

Right
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Odd powers of $n$ also have this property: $(mn)^k = m^kn^k$, and $(m+n)^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^k)$ if $k$ is an odd integer.

I have not thought about whether these are the only solutions.
[/sp]

there is a typo in above

$(m+n)^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^k)$

should be

$m^k+n^k = (m+n)(m^{k-1} - m^{k-2}n + \ldots + n^{k-1})$
 
Suggested solution:
As kaliprasad noted: $f(1) = 1$. So, $2n+1 \;\; | \;\; f(2n) + f(1) = f(2) \cdot f(n) + 1 \Rightarrow gcd(2n+1,f(2)) = 1$ for all $n$. This means, that $f(2)$ has no odd prime divisor, so $f(2) = 2^k$. Furthermore, $3 \;\; | 1 + f(2) = 1 + 2^k \Rightarrow k$ is odd (as Opalg noted). Also note, $f(2^m) = f(2) \cdot f(2) \cdot … \cdot f(2) = 2^{km}$ for all $m$. Now, for all $m$ and $n$, $2^m+n \;\; | \;\; f(2^{m}) + f(n) = 2^{km} + f(n)$. But $k$ is odd, so $2^m+n \;\; | \;\; 2^{km} + n^k$. Thus $2^m+n \;\; | \;\; f(n)-n^k$. But this is valid for all $m$, so $f(n) – n^k = 0 \Rightarrow f(n) = n^k.$
We have now proven, that $f(n) = n^k$ for all $n$ for some fixed odd number $k$. On the other hand, it is easily seen that functions of this form satisfy the given conditions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top