Find all numbers x which satisfy the following inequality

AI Thread Summary
The inequality (1/x) + (1/(1-x)) > 0 simplifies to 1/(x(1-x)) > 0, indicating that the solution is valid for 0 < x < 1. A misunderstanding arises from Spivak's assertion that x > 1 is also a solution, which is deemed incorrect. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using parentheses in calculations to avoid ambiguity. Participants suggest that careful step-by-step calculations can prevent such errors. Overall, the correct interpretation of the inequality shows that the valid range for x is only between 0 and 1.
r0bHadz
Messages
194
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


(1/x) + (1/(1-x)) > 0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


1+x-x/(x-x^2) > 0
1/(x-x^2) > 0
x-x^2 > 0
x> x^2 only occurs when 0<x<1

but in the solutions Spivak tells me

"x>1 or 0<x<1"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And if you try it for some ##x>1## you see that Spivak may well be right. Where do you suspect the flaw in your reasoning ?

Oops: [Edit] needed: if you try it for some ##x>1## you see that Spivak may well be wrong

(Provided you gave a truthful rendering of the problem statement and the corresponding solution !)

By the way: some brackets needed here ! :
r0bHadz said:
1+x-x/(x-x^2) > 0
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes r0bHadz
r0bHadz said:

Homework Statement


(1/x) + (1/(1-x)) > 0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


1+x-x/(x-x^2) > 0
1/(x-x^2) > 0
x-x^2 > 0
x> x^2 only occurs when 0<x<1
but in the solutions Spivak tells me

"x>1 or 0<x<1"

When you write 1+x-x/(x-x^2) > 0 you are saying
$$1+x-\frac{x}{x-x^2} > 0,$$
which is wrong. If you mean to say that
$$\frac{1+x-x}{x-x^2} > 0$$ then you need to use parentheses, like this: (1+x-x)/(x-x^2) > 0.
 
The problem statement represents a quite easy problem. I can't see what connection there is between the problem statement in the first line and the calculation you do. Start again- it is just straightforward combination of fractions into one and then the answer is almost obvious.
 
epenguin said:
The problem statement represents a quite easy problem. I can't see what connection there is between the problem statement in the first line and the calculation you do. Start again- it is just straightforward combination of fractions into one and then the answer is almost obvious.

I don't understand how he got x>1 from the problem statement
 
r0bHadz said:
I don't understand how he got x>1 from the problem statement
He got it by making a mistake; your answer is the correct one.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
epenguin said:
The problem statement represents a quite easy problem. I can't see what connection there is between the problem statement in the first line and the calculation you do.
He omitted some necessary parenthesis and should have shown some intermediate steps.

@r0bHadz , you should get in a habit of doing calculations in small, very safe, steps and using parenthesis whenever there is ambiguity. Do not try to do too much in your head. The calculations will go much easier and more reliably.:
1/x + 1/(1-x) = (1-x)/(x(1-x)) + x/(x(1-x)) = (1-x+x)/(x(1-x)) = 1/(x(1-x))

PS. It is very common for me to see beginners trying to do more in their head than I do. And I have a PhD in math.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
r0bHadz said:
...

but in the solutions Spivak tells me

"x>1 or 0<x<1"
That is the solution for something like ##\ \displaystyle \frac 1 x + \frac 1 {|1-x|} > 0 \,.##
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Ah I see, the calculation is simple but Spivak's x>1 is a mistake.
 
  • #10
epenguin said:
Ah I see, the calculation is simple but Spivak's x>1 is a mistake.
Or, as @SammyS points out, some absolute value signs may have been misprinted / misinterpreted as parentheses.
 
Back
Top