Find All Transitive G-Sets Up to Isomorphism w/ Subgroups of G

  • Thread starter Thread starter daveyinaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
daveyinaz
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
I read in a book on groups and representations that any transitive G-set is isomorphic to the coset space of some subgroup of G.
Does this mean we can determine all transitive G-sets up to isomorphism simply by finding all subgroups of G?

Just want to make sure that if this is the case that I have in my mind the right idea, so we take G = S_3, then all transitive G-sets are up to isomorphism...
G / \{e\}, G / \langle (12) \rangle , G / \langle (132) \rangle , G / G?

Note I do realize that \langle (13) \rangle is also a subgroup of S_3 but the way I see it the coset space would be the same as G / \langle (12) \rangle
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's correct, except that the coset space of a subgroup of G is not in general a quotient group (since the subgroup may not be normal)
 
Well that would make sense right? Since a G-set isn't necessarily a group...and if it's isomorphic to some coset space, then that coset space isn't a group either.
 
Yup, but writing

<br /> G / \{e\}, G / \langle (12) \rangle , G / \langle (132) \rangle , G / G<br />

This is notation for quotient groups. If H is a subgroup of G, the set of cosets is often denoted cos(G:H)
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top