Find an expression for the attenuation from the eqn given

BadPhysicistAtWork
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded to use the Homework Help Template to organize their HH threads
Having a big issue working through this problem and was wondering if somebody, much smarter than I, could give me a few pointers. Anyway here's the problem:

Given that k2=εμω2-iωμσ

By writing the wave number as k=kr-iki.
Show that ki, which determines attenuation, can be expressed by:
ki=ω(εμ/2)1/2[(1+(σ22ε2))1/2)-1]1/2

I've started by equating real and imaginary parts however I find an impasse where I have a quartic equation.

I'd been incredibly grateful for any answers, thank you in advance!

Just as a quick note, I followed the following process but reached an impasse (may be completely off base here):
k2=εμω2-iωμσ
Substitute k=kr-iki. into the equation which gives;
kr2-2ikrki-ki2=εμω2-iωμσ
Then split into two equations by equating real and imaginary parts;
(1) kr2-ki2=εμω2
(2) εμω2=ωμσ/2ki
Now (2) into (1) gives;
(ωμσ/2ki)2-ki2=εμω2
Then rearranging gives;
ki4+εμω2ki22μ2σ2/4

[EDIT: Realised i'd been a bit of an idiot and missed what should have been quite obvious, thank you for pointing it out!]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
it is a quadratic... set k_{i} = \alpha and us the quadratic equation for \alpha and take the square root...
 
Actually really disappointed i myself for not seeing that... Thank you for that, really made this a lot easier.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top