Find angular seperation of spectral lines with a grating spectrometer

AI Thread Summary
To find the angular separation between the hydrogen-alpha spectral line at 656 nm and the sodium line at 589 nm using a 3500-line/cm grating spectrometer, the equation d sin(theta) = m * lambda is applicable, where d is the grating spacing. The correct value for d is 1/3500 cm, and attention to unit conversion is crucial. Some users encountered issues with sin(theta) exceeding 1, indicating potential errors in their calculations or unit conversions. Ensuring all measurements are consistently in meters is essential for accurate results. Proper application of the formula will yield the desired angular separation.
sailfast775
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



find the angular separation between the red hydrogen-alpha spectral line at 656nm and the yellow sodium line at 589nm if the two are observed in third order with a 3500-line/cm grating spectrometer.


Homework Equations


maximum equation for multi-slit interference
d sin(theta)=m*lamda

d=distance between two slits
m=the interger called the order (bright spots)
theta=angular seperation
lamda=wavelength

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried plugging all of my data into the equation above with d as 1/grading but I'm not sure if this is the right way to go about the problem. I'm not even sure if this is the best formula to use but I can't find any other relevant equations
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Pf sailfast

you are correct, your d is 1/3500 to get centimeters per grating. This equation is correct and applies to this problem. Just be careful with your units and 'm'
 
yay! i rock at PHYS
 
I have the same question here. But when I get sin(theta), I get something over 1. That is not possible. Is my equation wrong? Because I am very sure the units I've been using here are correct. I converted everything into meters.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top